Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933707›Full record

SynthesisCanadian respiratory journal2019

Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax: A Comparison between Neonates and Adults-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hamid Dahmarde, Fateme Parooie, Morteza Salarzaei

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian respiratory journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Lung sonography in infants and children].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Imaging of pleural disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hamid DahmardeDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Fateme ParooieStudents Research Committee, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Morteza SalarzaeiStudents Research Committee, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5508-8669
Zabol University of Medical Sciences · IRZahedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonates and adults. Method: The searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MS and HD) to find the relevant studies published from 01/01/2009 until the end of 01/01/2019. We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase™ via ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS, and we searched OpenGrey (http://www.opengrey.eu/) and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry (http://who.int/ictrp) for unpublished literature and ongoing studies. The keywords used in the search strategy were pneumothorax or ultrasound or chest ultrasonography or neonate or adult or aerothorax or sensitivity or specificity or diagnostic accuracy. The list of previous study resources and systematic reviews was also searched for identifying the published studies (MS and HD). Analyses were performed using Meta-Disc 1.4. Results: In total, 1,565 patients (255 neonates, 1212 adults, and 101 pediatrics suspected of pneumothorax) were investigated in 10 studies. The overall specificity of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in both populations of adults and neonates was 85.1% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 81.1%-88.5%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the sensitivity was 98.6% (95% CI 97.7%-99.2%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 387.72 (95% CI 76.204-1972.7). For the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonates, the ultrasound sensitivity was 96.7% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 88.3%-99.6%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the specificity was 100% (95% CI 97.7%-100%). For the diagnosis of pneumothorax in adults, the ultrasound sensitivity was 82.9% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 78.3-86.9%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the specificity was 98.2% (95% CI 97.0%-99.0%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 423.13 (95% CI 45.222-3959.1). Analyzing studies indicated that the sensitivity of "absence lung sliding" sign for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 87.2% (95% CI 77.7-93.7), and specificity was 99.4% (95% CI 96.5%-100%). DOR was 556.74 (95% CI 100.03-3098.7). The sensitivity of "lung point" sign for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 82.1% (95% CI 71.7%-89.8%), and the specificity was 100% (at the confidence interval of 95% CI 97.6%-100%). DOR was 298.0 (95% CI 58.893-1507.8). Conclusion: The diagnosis of pneumothorax using ultrasound is accurate and reliable; additionally, it can result in timely diagnoses specifically in neonatal pneumothorax. Using this method facilitates the therapy process; lack of ionizing radiation and easy operation are benefits of this imaging technique.

Indexed as

AdultHumansInfant, NewbornLungPneumothoraxSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31933707
PMCPMC6942780
OpenAlexW2996464620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.