SynthesisCanadian respiratory journal2019
Accuracy of Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax: A Comparison between Neonates and Adults-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Canadian respiratory journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidance for performance, utilization, and education of cardiac and lung point-of-care ultrasonography from the Japanese Society of Echocardiography.Journal of echocardiography · 2024Guideline
- Impact of Prehospital Lung Ultrasound on Diagnostic Precision and Hospital Transport in Patients with Dyspnea and Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Creation of an Open-Access Lung POCUS Image Database for Deep Learning and Neural Network Applications.POCUS journal · 2026Article
- Bedside lung ultrasound versus chest CT in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- [Lung sonography in infants and children].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Article
- Interrater Agreement of Physicians Identifying Lung Sliding Artifact on B-Mode And M-Mode Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS).POCUS journal · 2025Article
- Value of focused lung ultrasound in diagnosing and monitoring pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Breathe easy, baby, breathe. Lung ultrasound in neonatal critical care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Performance of thoracic ultrasonography compared with chest radiography for the detection of rib fractures using computed tomography as a reference standard.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Low Diagnostic Accuracy of Transthoracic Ultrasound for the Assessment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Emergency Setting: A Multicentric Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Setting the Standards: Neonatal Lung Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Imaging of pleural disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Review
- ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Respiratory Intensive Care Assembly.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Evidence-based training and certification: the ERS thoracic ultrasound training programme.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023Review
- Point-of-Care Thoracic Ultrasound in Children: New Advances in Pediatric Emergency Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023Review
- Objective structured clinical examination in basic thoracic ultrasound: a European study of validity evidence.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Neonatal pneumothoraces with atypical location: the role of lung ultrasound.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Lung ultrasound in blunt chest trauma: A clinical review.Ultrasound (Leeds, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonates and adults. Method: The searches were conducted by two independent researchers (MS and HD) to find the relevant studies published from 01/01/2009 until the end of 01/01/2019. We searched for published literature in the English language in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase™ via ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Trip database. For literature published in other languages, we searched national databases (Magiran and SID), KoreaMed, and LILACS, and we searched OpenGrey (http://www.opengrey.eu/) and the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry (http://who.int/ictrp) for unpublished literature and ongoing studies. The keywords used in the search strategy were pneumothorax or ultrasound or chest ultrasonography or neonate or adult or aerothorax or sensitivity or specificity or diagnostic accuracy. The list of previous study resources and systematic reviews was also searched for identifying the published studies (MS and HD). Analyses were performed using Meta-Disc 1.4. Results: In total, 1,565 patients (255 neonates, 1212 adults, and 101 pediatrics suspected of pneumothorax) were investigated in 10 studies. The overall specificity of chest ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in both populations of adults and neonates was 85.1% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 81.1%-88.5%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the sensitivity was 98.6% (95% CI 97.7%-99.2%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 387.72 (95% CI 76.204-1972.7). For the diagnosis of pneumothorax in neonates, the ultrasound sensitivity was 96.7% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 88.3%-99.6%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the specificity was 100% (95% CI 97.7%-100%). For the diagnosis of pneumothorax in adults, the ultrasound sensitivity was 82.9% at the confidence interval of 95 percent (95% CI 78.3-86.9%). At the confidence interval of 95 percent, the specificity was 98.2% (95% CI 97.0%-99.0%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 423.13 (95% CI 45.222-3959.1). Analyzing studies indicated that the sensitivity of "absence lung sliding" sign for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 87.2% (95% CI 77.7-93.7), and specificity was 99.4% (95% CI 96.5%-100%). DOR was 556.74 (95% CI 100.03-3098.7). The sensitivity of "lung point" sign for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 82.1% (95% CI 71.7%-89.8%), and the specificity was 100% (at the confidence interval of 95% CI 97.6%-100%). DOR was 298.0 (95% CI 58.893-1507.8). Conclusion: The diagnosis of pneumothorax using ultrasound is accurate and reliable; additionally, it can result in timely diagnoses specifically in neonatal pneumothorax. Using this method facilitates the therapy process; lack of ionizing radiation and easy operation are benefits of this imaging technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.