Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933677›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2019

Finite Element Modelling of Single Cell Based on Atomic Force Microscope Indentation Method.

Lili Wang, Li Wang, Limeng Xu, Weiyi Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Macrophages modulate stiffness-related foreign body responses through plasma membrane deformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Modeling stem cell nucleus mechanics using confocal microscopy.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Synthetic Data in Quantitative Scanning Probe Microscopy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lili WangShanxi Key Laboratory of Material Strength & Structural Impact, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China.
Li WangShanxi Key Laboratory of Material Strength & Structural Impact, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China.
Limeng XuShanxi Key Laboratory of Material Strength & Structural Impact, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China.
Weiyi ChenShanxi Key Laboratory of Material Strength & Structural Impact, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-5653
Taiyuan University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stiffness of cells, especially cancer cells, is a key mechanical property that is closely associated with their biomechanical functions, such as the mechanotransduction and the metastasis mechanisms of cancer cells. In light of the low survival rate of single cells and measurement uncertainty, the finite element method (FEM) was used to quantify the deformations and predict the stiffness of single cells. To study the effect of the cell components on overall stiffness, two new FEM models were proposed based on the atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation method. The geometric sizes of the FEM models were determined by AFM topography images, and the validity of the FEM models was verified by comparison with experimental data. The effect of the intermediate filaments (IFs) and material properties of the cellular continuum components on the overall stiffness were investigated. The experimental results showed that the stiffness of cancer cells has apparent positional differences. The FEM simulation results show that IFs contribute only slightly to the overall stiffness within 10% strain, although they can transfer forces directly from the membrane to the nucleus. The cytoskeleton (CSK) is the major mechanical component of a cell. Furthermore, parameter studies revealed that the material properties (thickness and elasticity) of the continuum have a significant influence on the overall cellular stiffness while Poisson's ratio has less of an influence on the overall cellular stiffness. The proposed FEM models can determine the contribution of the major components of the cells to the overall cellular stiffness and provide insights for understanding the response of cells to the external mechanical stimuli and studying the corresponding mechanical mechanisms and cell biomechanics.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisMicroscopy, Atomic ForceBiomechanical PhenomenaCell MembraneCell NucleusComputer SimulationCytoplasmCytoskeletonElasticityElastic ModulusHeLa CellsHumansMechanotransduction, CellularNeoplasmsPoisson DistributionSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31933677
PMCPMC6942797
OpenAlexW2995142412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.