Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933676›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2019

Gait Biomarkers Classification by Combining Assembled Algorithms and Deep Learning: Results of a Local Study.

Eddy Sánchez-DelaCruz, Roberto Weber, R R Biswal, Jose Mejía, Gandhi Hernández-Chan, Heberto Gómez-Pozos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Automatic gait analysis in canines using computer vision.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eddy Sánchez-DelaCruzDepartamento de Posgrado, Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Misantla, Veracruz, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-7799
Roberto WeberServicios Médicos, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, Mexico.
R R BiswalTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Mexico.
Jose MejíaUniversidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-6623
Gandhi Hernández-ChanConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Información Geoespacial, Mexico City, Mexico.
Heberto Gómez-PozosUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, Mexico.
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Xalapa · MXSecretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación · MXTecnológico de Monterrey · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo · MXUniversidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning, one of the core disciplines of artificial intelligence, is an approach whose main emphasis is analytical model building. In other words, machine learning enables an automaton to make its own decisions based on a previous training process. Machine learning has revolutionized every research sector, including health care, by providing precise and accurate decisions involving minimal human interventions through pattern recognition. This is emphasized in this research, which addresses the issue of "support for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recognition." DN is a disease that affects a large proportion of the global population. In this research, we have used gait biomarkers of subjects representing a particular sector of population located in southern Mexico to identify persons suffering from DN. To do this, we used a home-made body sensor network to capture raw data of the walking pattern of individuals with and without DN. The information was then processed using three sampling criteria and 23 assembled classifiers, in combination with a deep learning algorithm. The architecture of the best combination was chosen and reconfigured for better performance. The results revealed a highly acceptable classification with greater than 85% accuracy when using these combined approaches.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGaitAccelerometryAdultAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersDatabases, FactualDiabetic NeuropathiesFemaleHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31933676
PMCPMC6942791
OpenAlexW2995443069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.