Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933529›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2020

Toxicity evaluation of 6-mercaptopurine-Chitosan nanoparticles in rats.

Prem Kumar Govindappa, Darukeshwara Joladarashi, Raghavendra Lakshmana Shetty Hallur, Jagadeesh S Sanganal, Ayyalasomayajula Ratna Phani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Thiopurine Drug Delivery: The Current State-of-the-Art.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Prem Kumar GovindappaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Darukeshwara JoladarashiDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33613, USA.
Raghavendra Lakshmana Shetty HallurDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), CEP18618-687 São Paulo, Brazil.
Jagadeesh S SanganalDepartment of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bangalore, Karnataka 560 024, India.
Ayyalasomayajula Ratna PhaniInnovative Nano and Micro Technologies Private Limited, Mysore Road, Bangalore, Karnataka 5600059, India.
Karnataka Veterinary Animal and Fisheries Sciences University · INPennsylvania State University · USUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) is an effective immunosuppressant and anti-cancer drug. However, the usage of 6-MP is limited due to its well-known side effects, such as myelotoxicity and hepato-renal toxicity. To curtail the potential toxic effects, we have used chitosan as a natural biodegradable and biocompatible polysaccharide to synthesize 6-Mercaptopurine-Chitosan Nanoparticles (6-MP-CNPs).

methodsThe 6-MP-CNPssize, morphology, physicochemical interactions, and thermal stability were characterized using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), respectively. The loading efficiency of the 6-MP in CNPs was estimated using LCMS/MS. Then, the 6-MP-CNPs were subjected to

resultsThe DLS and SEM analysis respectively indicated size (70.0 nm to 400.0 nm), polydispersity index (0.462), and zeta potential (54.9 mV) with improved morphology of 6-MP-CNPs. The FTIR and DSC results showed the efficient interactive and stable nature of the 6-MP-CNPs, which sustained the drug-delivery process. The loading efficiency of 6-MP-CNPs was found to be 25.23%. The chitosan improved the lethal dose (LD50 cut off) of 6-MP-CNPs (1000 mg/kg b.w) against 6-MP (500 mg/kg b.w) and also significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduces the toxic adverse effect (28-day repeated oral dose) on hemato-biochemical and hepato-renal histological profiles.

conclusionThe findings suggest that chitosan, as a prime drug-delivery carrier, significantly alleviates the acute and sub-acute toxic effects of 6-MP.

Indexed as

6-MercaptopurineAnti-cancerChitosanNanoparticleToxicity

Identifiers

PMID31933529
PMCPMC6950973
OpenAlexW2992244067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.