ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020
Improving Pediatric Academic Global Health Collaborative Research and Agenda Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06075108 (P-KIDs CARE), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
P-KIDs CARE: An Intervention to Address Health Systems Delays to Care for Injured Children in Tanzania
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying critical gaps in research to advance global surgery by 2030: a systematic mapping review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Virtual global health in graduate medical education: a systematic review.International journal of medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Authorship representation in global emergency medicine: a bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2020.BMJ global health · 2022Pooled it
- Income-Based Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Virtual Global Health Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Exploring supportive roles for global north investigators in global health research.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Building a framework to decolonize global emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Access, interest and equity considerations for virtual global health activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- A pragmatic approach to equitable global health partnerships in academic health sciences.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- A framework for sustainable capacity-building for collaborative North-South translational health research and training in a resource-constrained setting.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- When Global Becomes Virtual: A Survey of Virtual Global Health Education Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Pediatric Educators.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- Has Authorship in the Decolonizing Global Health Movement Been Colonized?Annals of global health · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of publication of pediatric global health abstracts from seven major international conferences.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Perceived roles, benefits and barriers of virtual global health partnership initiatives: a cross-sectional exploratory study.Global health research and policy · 2022Article
- Where there is no local author: a network bibliometric analysis of authorship parasitism among research conducted in sub-Saharan Africa.BMJ global health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic global health collaborations have the potential to improve joint understanding of health issues in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our objective was to elucidate perceptions of benefits and challenges of academic global health collaborations as well as areas for improving collaborative research conducted in LMICs. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study surveyed investigators' perceptions of benefits and challenges of pediatric academic global health collaborations. Authors of articles from four pediatric journals reporting pediatric research conducted in LMICs published between 2006 and 2015 were surveyed. Responses of LMIC investigators were compared with those of investigators in high-income countries (HICs). Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using a combined thematic and content analysis approach. Of 1,420 potential respondents, 252 (17.7%) responded to the survey. Collaborative research with investigators from other countries was perceived as beneficial by 88.5% of respondents (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.