Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933466›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020

Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing on Filter Paper-Dried Serum for Laboratory-Based Dengue Surveillance-American Samoa, 2018.

Emily J Curren, Aifili John Tufa, William Thane Hancock, Brad J Biggerstaff, June S Vaifanua-Leo, Catherine A Montalbo, Tyler M Sharp, Marc Fischer, Susan L Hills, Carolyn V Gould

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily J CurrenEpidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Aifili John TufaAmerican Samoa Department of Health, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
William Thane HancockDivision of State and Local Readiness, CDC, Hagatna, Guam.
Brad J BiggerstaffDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fort Collins, Colorado.
June S Vaifanua-LeoAmerican Samoa Department of Health, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
Catherine A MontalboAmerican Samoa Department of Health, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
Tyler M SharpDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fort Collins, Colorado.
Marc FischerDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fort Collins, Colorado.
Susan L HillsDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fort Collins, Colorado.
Carolyn V GouldDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fort Collins, Colorado.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USAmerican Samoa Government · ASEpidemic Intelligence Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory-based surveillance for arboviral diseases is challenging in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the use of filter paper-dried sera for detection of dengue virus (DENV) RNA during an outbreak in American Samoa. Matched liquid and filter paper-dried sera were collected from patients with suspected dengue and shipped to a reference laboratory for diagnostic testing. RNA was extracted from each sample and tested for DENV RNA by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Of 18 RT-PCR-positive liquid specimens, 14 matched filter paper-dried specimens were positive for a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI, 55-91%). Of 82 RT-PCR-negative liquid specimens, all filter paper-dried specimens were negative for a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 96-100%). Shipping of filter paper-dried specimens was similarly timely but less expensive than shipping liquid sera. Using filter paper-dried serum or blood can be a cost-effective and sustainable approach to surveillance of dengue and other arboviral diseases in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAmerican SamoaDengueHumansReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsSerum

Identifiers

PMID31933466
PMCPMC7056409
OpenAlexW2999067578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.