Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933287›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical medicine2019

Powered by Open Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges in the Pharma Sector.

Maria Angeles Martinez-Grau, Maria Alvim-Gaston

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Angeles Martinez-GrauEli Lilly and Company, Avda. de la Industria 30, Alcobendas, 28108, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Alvim-GastonEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA. alvim-gaston_maria@lilly.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of innovation in medicines is clear. Despite all of the progress in the twenty-first century, there are still many unmet medical needs and opportunities to improve healthcare. The challenges for pharmaceutical companies include ways in which to stay competitive and flexible in an environment of constant knowledge growth and increasingly sophisticated technologies, and ways to generate sufficient revenues to sustain their own growth. To that end, pharmaceutical companies are compelled to adapt different business models in the face of new challenges. The industry is plagued with long research and development (R&D) cycles and low success rates for innovative treatments; something has to change. The need to collaborate externally across the process of discovery, development, manufacturing and commercialization is a must. Furthermore, collaborations have increased in frequency and scope, expanding the opportunities to access global scientific talent in academia, research institutes and biotechnology companies. Despite the perception that pharma companies are 'closed' or tightly controlled industries, open innovation is already well established in the pharmaceutical sector and used to supplement R&D in the process of bringing new medicines for patients faster, and at a lower cost. Over the years, each pharma company has tailored the open-innovation concept to develop its own model based on particular needs and offerings. Independently of the model, the creation of successful partnerships in external innovation requires reaching out and connecting beyond the traditional organizational boundaries. Substantial internal cultural changes are required to implement open-innovation strategies that should co-exist without competing with the traditional ways of operating. Major changes bring challenges but create multiple opportunities for scientists and organizations. High-quality drug discovery requires continuous learning and an open way of thinking to adopt novel operational models and to implement efficient collaborations.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.