Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933267›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical medicine2019

Peptide-Based Therapeutics for Oncology.

Elizaveta Fisher, Kirill Pavlenko, Alexander Vlasov, Galina Ramenskaya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in Alzheimer's Disease-Associated Aβ Therapy Based on Peptide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Challenges in delivering therapeutic peptides and proteins: A silk-based solution.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizaveta FisherSechenov First State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya str, 119991, Moscow, Russia. elizaveta.fisher@mail.ru.
Kirill PavlenkoMoscow Clinical Scientific Center, 86, Shosse Entuziastov, 111123, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander VlasovSechenov First State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya str, 119991, Moscow, Russia.
Galina RamenskayaSechenov First State Medical University, 8-2, Trubetskaya str, 119991, Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov University · RUMoscow Clinical Scientific Center · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of peptide-based drugs, which are usually synthetic analogues of endogenous peptides, is currently one of the most topical directions in drug development. Among them, antitumor peptide-based drugs are of great interest. Anticancer peptides can be classified into three main groups based on their mechanism of action: inhibitory, necrosis-inducing and pro-apoptotic peptides. As an antitumor therapy, peptides are considered to have at least the same efficacy as chemotherapy or surgical treatment, but offer advantages in terms of safety and tolerability, given that chemotherapy is usually characterized by severe adverse effects, and surgery carries additional risks for patients. Short peptides have a number of benefits over other molecules. First, compared with full-length proteins and antibodies, short peptides are less immunogenic, more stable ex-vivo (prolonged storage at room temperature), and have better tumor or organ permeability. Moreover, the production of such short peptide-based drugs is more cost effective. Second, in comparison with small organic molecules, peptides have higher efficacy and specificity. Finally, due to the fact that the main products of peptide metabolism are amino acids, these drugs are usually characterized by lower toxicity. Short peptides have a highly selective mechanism of action, thereby demonstrating low toxicity. Furthermore, with the addition of different stabilizing structural modifications, as well as novel drug delivery systems, the peptide-based drugs are proving to be promising therapeutics for cancer mono- or polytherapy. However, challenges remain including that endogenous and synthetic peptide molecules can be oncogenic. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether peptides contribute to tumor growth. In order to answer such questions, numerous preclinical and clinical studies of peptide-based therapeutics are currently being conducted.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCancer VaccinesHumansNeoplasmsPeptidesAntineoplastic AgentsCancer VaccinesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID31933267
OpenAlexW2907080393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.