Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933259›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2020

Resection of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme in elderly patients: a pseudo-randomized analysis revealed clinical benefit.

Mateo Tomas Fariña Nuñez, Pamela Franco, Debora Cipriani, Nicolas Neidert, Simon P Behringer, Irina Mader, Daniel Delev, Christian Fung, Jürgen Beck, Roman Sankowski and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Management of glioblastoma in the elderly.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Optimal managements of elderly patients with glioblastoma.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateo Tomas Fariña NuñezTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. mateo.farina@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6427-5407
Pamela FrancoTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Debora CiprianiTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nicolas NeidertTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Simon P BehringerTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Irina MaderDepartment of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniel DelevDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Christian FungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jürgen BeckDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Roman SankowskiInstitute of Neuropathology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nils Henrik NicolayMedical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Dieter Henrik HeilandTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Oliver SchnellTranslational NeuroOncology Research Group, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElderly patients constitute an expanding part of our society. Due to a continuously increasing life expectancy, an optimal quality of life is expected even into advanced age. Glioblastoma (GBM) is more common in older patients, but they are still often withheld from efficient treatment due to worry of worse tolerance and have a significantly worse prognosis compared to younger patients. Our retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the therapeutic benefit from a second resection in recurrent glioblastoma of elderly patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included a cohort of 39 elderly patients (> 65 years) with a second resection as treatment option in the case of a tumor recurrence. A causal inference model was built by multiple non- and semiparametric models, which was used to identify matched patients from our elderly GBM database which comprises 538 patients. The matched cohorts were analyzed by a Cox-regression model adjusted by time-dependent covariates.

resultsThe Cox-regression analysis showed a significant survival benefit (Hazard Ratio: 0.6, 95% CI 0.36-0.9, p-value = 0.0427) for the re-resected group (18.0 months, 95% CI 13.97-23.2 months) compared to the group without re-resection (10.1 months, 95% CI 8.09-20.9 months). No differences in the co-morbidities or hemato-oncological side effects during chemotherapy could be detected. Anesthetic- and surgical complications were rare and comparable to the complication rate of patients undergoing the first-line resection.

conclusionTaken together, in elderly patients, re-resection is an acceptable treatment option in the recurrent state of a glioblastoma. The individual evaluation of the patients' medical status as well as the chances of withstanding general anesthesia needs to be done in close interdisciplinary consultation. If these requirements are met, elderly patients benefit from a re-resection.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisReoperationRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateElderly patientsRecurrent glioblastoma multiformeRe-Resection

Identifiers

PMID31933259
OpenAlexW3000737425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.