ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2019
A Retrospective Review of Serious Adverse Drug Reaction Reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow Database from September 2004 to December 2016.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends and Patterns of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Sierra Leone: A Retrospective Analysis of VigiFlow Data (2008-2022).Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Probing the in-depth analysis of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Central India.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- A retrospective analysis of the pharmacovigilance data registry in a tertiary teaching hospital in Jordan.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Improving ADR reporting in Jordan: a qualitative exploration of pharmacists' perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Quality of Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions to Antimicrobials Improved Following Operational Research: A before-and-after Study in Sierra Leone (2017-2023).Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Drug fever: a narrative review.Annals of clinical epidemiology · 2023Article
- Inconsistent Country-Wide Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions to Antimicrobials in Sierra Leone (2017-2021): A Wake-Up Call to Improve Reporting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The severity of adverse drug reactions and their influencing factors based on the ADR monitoring center of Henan Province.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Rapid review of suspected adverse drug events due to remdesivir in the WHO database; findings and implications.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- An analysis of the trends, characteristics, scope, and performance of the Zimbabwean pharmacovigilance reporting scheme.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health care professionals towards adverse drug reaction reporting in public sector primary health care facilities in a South African district.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a source of concern in healthcare as they negatively affect patients. Serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) have an even greater impact on patients and the system in terms of morbidity and financial burden. The establishment of National Pharmacovigilance Centers (NPCs) has enhanced ADR reporting in Africa. The Nigerian Pharmacovigilance Centre has been collecting ADR reports using VigiFlow since 2004.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and analyze SADR reports in the Nigerian VigiFlow database in order to profile the patients with SADRs, the medicines most implicated, system organ classes (SOCs) affected, outcome of such reactions, including fatalities, and ADR reporting trends over the years. We also looked at the data elements provided in the reports as a proxy measure of report quality.
methodWe retrospectively assessed all individual case safety reports (ICSRs) received by the NPC in Nigeria and entered into VigiFlow as SADR reports between September 2004 and December 2016. We defined SADR as any untoward reaction to any medicine dose that resulted in death, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was life-threatening. The suspected SADRs were analyzed at the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities SOC and Preferred Term levels.
resultsA total of 11,222 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow during the study period, of which 298 (3%) were classified as SADR reports. Adults were the most affected (244/282; 87%). The median number of medicines per report was 3 (interquartile range = 2-4.75). Nevirapine (36/336; 11%), as a single entity, was the most reported medicine. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection affected 128/232 (55%) of those with SADRs. There was no statistically significant association between the number of reactions per report and sex of the patients (p = 0.280), their age groups (p = 0.670), or the number of medicines per report (p = 0.640). Hospitalization was the most frequently cited reason for classifying a report as serious (151/276; 53%) and death was reported in 48 cases (48/283; 17%). Based on the SOC, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (139/550; 25%) was the most affected, while anemia (55/550; 10%) was the most reported specific reaction. A substantial number of patients (107/256; 42%) either recovered fully or were recovering from the SADRs. The number of SADR reports received varied by year with no consistent trend.
conclusionThere is under-reporting of ADRs in the Nigerian VigiFlow
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.