Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933236›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2020

Conducting gender-based analysis of existing databases when self-reported gender data are unavailable: the GENDER Index in a working population.

Anaïs Lacasse, M Gabrielle Pagé, Manon Choinière, Marc Dorais, Bilkis Vissandjée, Hermine Lore Nguena Nguefack, Joel Katz, Oumar Mallé Samb, Alain Vanasse, TORSADE Cohort Working Group

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating gender medicine into modern healthcare: Progress and barriers.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Operationalisation of Sex and Gender in Quantitative Health-Related Research: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anaïs LacasseDépartement des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), 445, boul. de l'Université, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, J9X 5E4, Canada. lacassea@uqat.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-5145
M Gabrielle PagéCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Manon ChoinièreCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marc DoraisStatSciences Inc., Notre-Dame-de-l'Île-Perrot, Québec, Canada.
Bilkis VissandjéeFaculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Hermine Lore Nguena NguefackDépartement des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), 445, boul. de l'Université, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, J9X 5E4, Canada.
Joel KatzDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Oumar Mallé SambDépartement des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), 445, boul. de l'Université, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, J9X 5E4, Canada.
Alain VanasseDépartement de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
TORSADE Cohort Working Group

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) #PCG155479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGrowing attention has been given to considering sex and gender in health research. However, this remains a challenge in the context of retrospective studies where self-reported gender measures are often unavailable. This study aimed to create and validate a composite gender index using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS).

methodsAccording to scientific literature and expert opinion, the GENDER Index was built using several variables available in the CCHS and deemed to be gender-related (e.g., occupation, receiving child support, number of working hours). Among workers aged 18-50 years who had no missing data for our variables of interest (n = 29,470 participants), propensity scores were derived from a logistic regression model that included gender-related variables as covariates and where biological sex served as the dependent variable. Construct validity of propensity scores (GENDER Index scores) were then examined.

resultsWhen looking at the distribution of the GENDER Index scores in males and females, they appeared related but partly independent. Differences in the proportion of females appeared between groups categorized according to the GENDER Index scores tertiles (p < 0.0001). Construct validity was also examined through associations between the GENDER Index scores and gender-related variables identified a priori such as choosing/avoiding certain foods because of weight concerns (p < 0.0001), caring for children as the most important thing contributing to stress (p = 0.0309), and ability to handle unexpected/difficult problems (p = 0.0375).

conclusionThe GENDER Index could be useful to enhance the capacity of researchers using CCHS data to conduct gender-based analysis among populations of workers.

Indexed as

BiasDatabases, FactualResearchSex FactorsAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreSelf ReportYoung AdultAdministrative databasesCanadian Community Health SurveyCCHSComposite indexExisting dataGenderMeasurementSecondary analysisSexWorkers

Identifiers

PMID31933236
PMCPMC7109207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.