Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933161›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nephrology2020

Uric acid in CKD: has the jury come to the verdict?

Barbara Bonino, Giovanna Leoncini, Elisa Russo, Roberto Pontremoli, Francesca Viazzi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A metabolomic signatures in hyperuricemia: a systematic review.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara BoninoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Giovanna LeonciniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Elisa RussoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Roberto PontremoliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Francesca ViazziDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy. francesca.viazzi@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4219-7043
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological studies show that hyperuricemia independently predicts the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in individuals with normal kidney function both in the general population and in subjects with diabetes. As a matter of fact, an unfavorable role of uric acid may somewhat be harder to identify in the context of multiple risk factors and pathogenetic mechanisms typical of overt CKD such as proteinuria and high blood pressure. Although the discrepancy in clinical results could mean that urate lowering treatment does not provide a constant benefit in all patients with hyperuricemia and CKD, we believe that the inconsistency in the results from available meta-analysis is mainly due to inadequate sample size, short follow-up times and heterogeneity in study design characterizing the randomized controlled trials included in the analyses. Therefore, available data support the view that hyperuricemia has a damaging impact on kidney function, while preliminary evidence suggests that treatment of so-called asymptomatic hyperuricemia may be helpful to slow or delay the progression of chronic kidney.

Indexed as

HyperuricemiaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicUric AcidDisease ProgressionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsUric AcidCardiovascular diseaseChronic kidney diseaseUrate lowering treatmentUric acid

Identifiers

PMID31933161
OpenAlexW2999661403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.