ArticleGlycoconjugate journal2020
The diagnostic value of serum DSA-TRF in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Glycoconjugate journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pediatric Liver Disease Patients and Secondary Glycosylation Abnormalities.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
TRF is a glycoprotein mainly secreted by hepatocytes, The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of aberrant glycosylated serum transferrin (TRF) especially containing multi-antennary glycans in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).A total of 581 subjects including HCC patients, liver cirrhosis (LC) patients, chronic hepatitis (CHB) patients and healthy controls (HC) were recruited. All the subjects were randomly assigned to training group (n = 411) and validation group (n = 170). We firstly analyzed the serum protein N-glycome profiling of HCC, LC, and HC by DNA sequencer-assisted fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (DSA-FACE) technology. We established a lectin-antibody sandwich ELISA (Lectin-ELISA) method to detect multi-antennary glycans-contained TRF (DSA-TRF) in serum, in which Datura stramonium Agglutinin (DSA) was used for specific recognition. Levels of serum DSA-TRF and TRF were analyzed respectively. The diagnostic efficacies of DSA-TRF and TRF of differentiating HCC patients from CHB, LC patients and HC within the training group were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and tested in the validation group.The result found that in training group, serum TRF and DSA-TRF levels differed significantly between HCC (1.86 ± 0.50, g/L, 0.285 ± 0.06), CHB + LC (2.39 ± 0.74, g/L, 0.189 ± 0.07) and HC (1.92 ± 0.69, g/L, 0.249 ± 0.09) (HCC vs. CHB + LC, P < 0.001; HCC vs. HC, P < 0.001; CHB + LC vs. HC, P < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of DSA-TRF was significantly superior to AFP (0.880, 95%CI: 0.834-0.925 vs. 0.776, 95%CI: 0.725-0.827, P = 0.003) in differentiating HCC from CHB + LC. The AUC of diagnostic model GlycoTRF1 (0.981, 95%CI: 0.969-0.993) was higher than DSA-TRF and AFP alone (P<0.001) in differentiating HCC from CHB + LC, which was verified in validation group.The results indicated that the serum DSA-TRF might serve as a potential glycan biomarker for distinguishing HCC from CHB and LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.