Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933022›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020

Magnetic Particle Imaging of Macrophages Associated with Cancer: Filling the Voids Left by Iron-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Ashley V Makela, Jeffrey M Gaudet, Melissa A Schott, Olivia C Sehl, Christopher H Contag, Paula J Foster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nanoparticles in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley V MakelaThe Institute for Quantitative Health Science & Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. makelaas@msu.edu.
Jeffrey M GaudetThe Institute for Quantitative Health Science & Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Melissa A SchottThe Institute for Quantitative Health Science & Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Olivia C SehlRobarts Research Institute and Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher H ContagThe Institute for Quantitative Health Science & Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Paula J FosterRobarts Research Institute and Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Michigan State University · USWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR PJF 367445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic particle imaging (MPI) is an emerging molecular imaging technique that directly detects iron nanoparticles distributed in living subjects. Compared with imaging iron with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MPI signal can be measured to determine iron content in specific regions. In this paper, the detection of iron-labeled macrophages associated with cancer by MRI and MPI was compared. PROCEDURES: Imaging was performed on 4T1 tumor-bearing mice 16-21 days post-cancer cell implantation, 24 h after intravenous injection of Ferucarbotran, a superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) or Ferumoxytol, an ultra-small SPIO. Images of living mice were acquired on a 3T clinical MRI (General Electric, n = 6) or MPI (Magnetic Insight, n = 10) system. After imaging, tumors and lungs were removed, imaged by MPI and examined by histology.

resultsMRI signal voids were observed within all tumors. In vivo, MPI signals were observed in the tumors of 4 of 5 mice after the administration of each contrast agent and in all excised tumors. Signal voids visualized by MRI were more apparent in tumors of mice injected with Ferumoxytol than those that received Ferucarbotran; this was consistent with iron content measured by MPI. Signal voids relating to macrophage uptake of iron were not detected in lungs by MRI, since air also appears hypointense. In vivo, MPI could not differentiate between iron in the lungs vs the high signal from iron in the liver. However, once the lungs were excised, MPI signal was detectable and quantifiable. Histologic examination confirmed iron within macrophages present in the tumors.

conclusionsMPI provides quantitative information on in vivo iron labeling of macrophages that is not attainable with MRI. The optimal iron nanoparticle for MPI in general is still under investigation; however, for MPI imaging of macrophages labeled in vivo by intravenous administration, Ferumoxytol nanoparticles were superior to Ferucarbotran.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular ImagingAnimalsCell Line, TumorDextransFemaleIronLungMacrophagesMagnetite NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasmsRAW 264.7 CellsDextransferumoxidesIronMagnetite NanoparticlesBreast cancerIron oxide nanoparticleMagnetic particle imaging (MPI)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Tumor-associated macrophage (TAM)

Identifiers

PMID31933022
OpenAlexW2999772576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.