Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31933010›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2020

Propensities of Amino Acid Pairings in Secondary Structure of Globular Proteins.

Cevdet Nacar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Crosslinked Polypeptide Films via RAFT-Mediated Continuous Assembly of Polymers.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cevdet NacarDepartment of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. cevnacar@marmara.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-1495
Marmara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A class of secondary structure prediction algorithms use the information from the statistics of the residue pairs found in secondary structural elements. Because the protein folding process is dominated by backbone hydrogen bonding, an approach based on backbone hydrogen-bonded residue pairings would improve the predicting capabilities of these class algorithms. The reliability of the prediction algorithms depends on the quality of the statistics, therefore, of the data set. In this study, it was aimed to determine the propensities of the backbone hydrogen-bonded residue pairings for secondary structural elements of α-helix and β-sheet in globular proteins using a new and comprehensive data set created from the peptides deposited in Worldwide Protein Data Bank. A master data set including 4882 globular peptide chains with resolution better than 2.5 Å, sequence identity smaller than 25% and length of no shorter than 100 residues were created. Separate data sub sets also were created for helix and sheet structures from master set and each sub set includes 4594 and 4483 chains, respectively. Backbone hydrogen-bonded residue pairings in helices and sheets were detected and the propensities of them were represented as odds ratios (observed/[random or expected]) in matrices. Propensities assigned by this study to the residue pairings in secondary structural elements (as helix, overall strands, parallel strands and antiparallel strands) differ from the previous studies by 19 to 34%. These dissimilarities are important and they would cause further improvements in secondary structure prediction algorithms.

Indexed as

Hydrogen BondingProtein Structure, SecondaryAlgorithmsAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinDatasets as TopicProtein FoldingProteinsAmino AcidsProteinsHydrogen bondingResidue pairingResidue propensitySecondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID31933010
OpenAlexW2999212028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.