Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932940›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Intraoperative nasogastric tube during colorectal surgery may not be mandatory: a propensity score analysis of a prospective database.

Aurélien Venara, Jean-Francois Hamel, Eddy Cotte, Hélène Meillat, Pierre-Yves Sage, Karem Slim, GRACE Group*

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aurélien VenaraDepartment of Visceral and Endocrinal Surgery, CHU Angers, University Hospital of Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France. auvenara@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-4797
Jean-Francois HamelDepartment of Medicine, University of Health of Angers, 49000, Angers, France.
Eddy CotteDepartment of Visceral Surgery, CHU Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Université de Lyon, 69495, Pierre-Bénite Cedex, France.
Hélène MeillatDepartment of Visceral Surgery, CHU Grenoble, Université de Grenoble, 38700, La Tronche, France.
Pierre-Yves SageDepartment of Endocrinal and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, 63003, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Karem SlimDepartment of Visceral and Endocrinal Surgery, CHU Angers, University Hospital of Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
GRACE Group*
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvoiding the use of nasogastric tubes (NGTs) is recommended after colorectal surgery but there is no consensus on intraoperative gastric decompression using NGTs during colorectal surgery. The objective was to assess the effect of avoiding insertion of NGTs during colorectal surgery for the recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) functions.

method1561 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, for whom information on NGT use was available, were included in this retrospective analysis and propensity score analysis of the prospective GRACE Audit database. Patients who did and did not have an NGT during surgery were compared.

resultsAmong the study population of 1561 patients, 696 patients were matched to correct baseline differences between groups. The no-NGT group significantly improved GI motility impairment (e.g., less postoperative nausea [OR = 0.59; CI 95%: 0.42-0.84] and a better tolerance of early feeding [OR = 2.07; CI 95%: 1.33-3.22]). Such an association was also highlighted for reduced postoperative morbidity [OR = 0.60; CI 95%: 0.43-0.83], and especially pulmonary complications [OR = 0.08; CI 95%: 0.01-0.59], or parietal complications [OR = 0.29; CI 95%: 0.09-0.87]. The risk of postoperative ileus was not significantly reduced in the no-NGT group [OR = 0.67; CI 95%: 0.43-1.06].

conclusionNo NGT insertion during colorectal surgery is safe and could improve postoperative GI function recovery.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryDatabases as TopicIntubation, GastrointestinalPropensity ScoreFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryEarly feeding toleranceIntraoperative gastric decompressionNasogastric tubePostoperative nausea and vomiting

Identifiers

PMID31932940
OpenAlexW3000367159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.