Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932932›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2020

Analgesic effect of postoperative laparoscopic-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, associated with preoperative port-site infiltration, within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized clinical trial.

Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, Gilberto Gonzalez, Andrei Sarmiento, Miguel A Carbajo, Javier Ortiz-de-Solorzano, Maria Jose Castro, Jose Maria Jimenez, Lorea Zubiaga

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaime Ruiz-TovarCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain. jruiztovar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-2605
Gilberto GonzalezCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Andrei SarmientoCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Miguel A CarbajoCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Javier Ortiz-de-SolorzanoCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Maria Jose CastroCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Jose Maria JimenezCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Lorea ZubiagaCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.
Universidad de Valladolid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of ultrasonography to assist needle placement during transverse abdominal plane (TAP) technique has provided direct visualization of surround anatomical musculature and facial planes. However, the increased girth in patients undergoing bariatric surgery is challenging to visualize via ultrasonography which may lead to poor postoperative analgesia.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to investigate whether the addition of postoperative laparoscopic-guided TAP block as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen within the ERAS protocol compared to no block provides better postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing one-anastomosis gastric bypass surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospective clinical trial was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: patients undergoing postoperative laparoscopic-guided TAP (TAP-lap) and patients not receiving TAP-lap (Control). Multimodal analgesia included preoperative port-site infiltration with Bupivacaine 0.25% in both groups and systemic Acetaminophen. Pain quantification as measured by visual analogic scale (VAS) was assessed at 6 and 24 h after surgery, and 24-h postoperative opioid consumption.

resultsOne hundred and forty patients were included, 70 in each group. The mean operation time was 78.5 ± 14.4 min in TAP-lap and 75.9 ± 15.6 min in Control (NS). The mean postoperative pain, as measured by VAS, 6 h after surgery was 23.1 ± 11.3 mm in TAP-lap and 41.8 ± 16.2 mm in Control (p = 0.001). 24 h after surgery was 16.6 ± 11.4 mm in TAP-lap and 35.4 ± 12.7 mm in Control (p = 0.001). Morphine rescues were necessary in 14.2% in Control and 2.8% in TAP-lap (p = 0.035).

conclusionLaparoscopic-guided TAP block as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen can reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption, without increasing operative time.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryAbdominal MusclesAdultAnalgesiaFemaleGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyMaleNerve BlockPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesEnhanced recovery after surgeryERASMultimodal analgesiaOAGBOne-anastomosis gastric bypassPostoperative painTAPTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID31932932
OpenAlexW2999804852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.