Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932871›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Association between clinically relevant toxicities of pazopanib and sunitinib and the use of weak CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors.

Camille Azam, Pauline Claraz, Christine Chevreau, Camille Vinson, Ewa Cottura, Loïc Mourey, Damien Pouessel, Selena Guibaud, Olivia Pollet, Magali Le Goff and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A single-centre retrospective evaluation of potential drug-drug interactions in breast cancer patients undergoing CDK 4/6 inhibitors chemotherapy.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. PeerJ · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille AzamPharmacy department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Pauline ClarazPharmacy department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Christine ChevreauOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Camille VinsonPharmacy department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Ewa CotturaOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Loïc MoureyOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Damien PouesselOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Selena GuibaudOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Olivia PolletOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Magali Le GoffOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Catherine BardiesOncology department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Véronique PelagattiPharmacy department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France.
Jean Marie CanongePharmacy department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, France.
Florent PuissetPharmacy department IUCT (Institut Universitaire du Cancer) Oncopole, Institut Claudius Regaud, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, Toulouse CEDEX 9, 31059, France. puisset.florent@iuct-oncopole.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-5784
Institut Claudius Regaud · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSunitinib and pazopanib, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), may be targets of potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (P-PK-DDIs). While strong cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A4) inhibitors or inducers should cause a clinically relevant modification in plasma TKI concentrations, the effect of weak inhibitors is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between weak P-PK-DDI and clinically relevant toxicity in real life. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study including patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib for any malignancies, for whom a PK-DDI analysis was performed before starting TKI. The primary endpoint was the correlation between P-PK-DDIs and a dose decrease after 1 month of treatment. The secondary endpoint was the correlation between PK-DDIs and drug withdrawal due to toxicity.

resultsSeventy-six patients were assessed. A P-PK-DDI with weak CYP3A4 or P-gp inhibition was found in 14 patients. In patients with P-PK-DDI or without, the dose was reduced during the first month in 57.1% and 17.7% (p = 0.003) and the drug withdrawn in 42.8% and 11.3% (p = 0.011), respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was found between P-PK-DDI (CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors) and dose reduction, and between drug withdrawal and PK-DDI (CYP3A4 inhibitors).

conclusionP-PK-DDI was correlated with dose reduction and drug withdrawal due to toxicity. The causality of this relationship warrants to be assessed; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary in patients treated with TKI.

Indexed as

AgedATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansIndazolesMalePyrimidinesRetrospective StudiesSulfonamidesSunitinibATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1CYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsIndazolespazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibCYP3A4Drug-drug interactionPazopanibP-gpSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID31932871
OpenAlexW2999361420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.