Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932855›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Systems biology: current status and challenges.

Anze Zupanic, Hans C Bernstein, Ines Heiland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Characterization of the enzyme kinetics of EMP and HMP pathway inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Omics-based biomarkers discovery for Alzheimer's disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anze ZupanicDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Vecna Pot 111, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3303-9086
Hans C BernsteinFaculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-7708
Ines HeilandDepartment of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Biologibygget, Framstedet 39, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. ines.heiland@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9124-5112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We put together a special issue on current approaches in systems biology with a focus on mathematical modeling of metabolic networks. Mathematical models have increasingly been used to unravel molecular mechanisms of complex dynamic biological processes. We here provide a short introduction into the topics covered in this special issue, highlighting current developments and challenges.

Indexed as

HumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, TheoreticalSystems BiologyMathematical modelingMetabolic pathway analysisMulti-scale modelingNetwork dynamicsSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31932855
PMCPMC11104875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.