ArticleSoft matter2020
Molecular recognition with soft biomaterials.
Article in Soft matter, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymer-Based Hydrogels for Chemical Biosensing: From Bioreceptor Integration to Smart Applications.ACS applied polymer materials · 2026Review
- Novel green synthesis of polyfunctionally substituted phthalazines promoted by visible light, DFT studies and molecular docking with antimicrobial and antibiofilm potency.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymers (MIPs): A Multifaceted Tool in Modern Analysis.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- Tailor-Made Polysaccharides for Biomedical Applications.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Review
- Chromatographic Separation: A Versatile Strategy to Prepare Discrete and Well-Defined Polymer Libraries.Accounts of chemical research · 2024Article
- Integration of Adenylate Kinase 1 with Its Peptide Conformational Imprint.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Supramolecular Assembly of His-Tagged Fluorescent Protein Guests within Coiled-Coil Peptide Crystal Hosts: Three-Dimensional Ordering and Protein Thermal Stability.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
- Advanced biomedical hydrogels: molecular architecture and its impact on medical applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2021Review
- Aptamer-functionalized hydrogels: An emerging class of biomaterials for protein delivery, cell capture, regenerative medicine, and molecular biosensing.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
- Epitope-imprinted polymers: Design principles of synthetic binding partners for natural biomacromolecules.Science advances · 2021Article
- Polymer-Based Carriers in Dental Local Healing-Review and Future Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Degradable Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)-co-Methacrylic Acid Nanoparticles for Controlled Delivery of Growth Factors for Bone Regeneration.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2020Article
- The effect of saccharides on equilibrium swelling of thermo-responsive gels.RSC advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomacromolecules and engineered materials can achieve molecular recognition if they engage their ligand with properly oriented and chemically complementary moieties. Recently, there has been significant interest in fabricating recognitive soft materials, which possess specific affinity for biological analytes. We present a summary and evaluation of current recognitive materials for biosensing, drug delivery, and regenerative medicine applications. We highlight the impact of material composition on the extent and specificity of ligand adsorption, citing new theoretical and empirical evidence. We conclude with a guide for synthesizing and characterizing novel recognitive materials, as well as recommendations for ligand selection and experimental design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.