Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932757›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2020

Outcompeting cancer.

Medhavi Vishwakarma, Eugenia Piddini

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Critical role of cell competition in gliomagenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Stem cell competition.Current topics in developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Medhavi VishwakarmaSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-5217
Eugenia PiddiniSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. ep16996@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-076X
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12460Cancer Research UK 26831Cancer Research UK C38607/A26831Wellcome Trust 205010/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumour microenvironment plays a critical role in determining tumour fate. Within that environment, and indeed throughout epithelial tissues, cells experience competition with their neighbours, with those less fit being eliminated by fitter adjacent cells. Herein we discuss evidence suggesting that mutations in cancer cells may be selected for their ability to exploit cell competition to kill neighbouring host cells, thereby facilitating tumour expansion. In some instances, cell competition may help host tissues to defend against cancer, by removing neoplastic and aneuploid cells. Cancer risk factors, such as high-sugar or high-fat diet and inflammation, impact cell competition-based host defences, suggesting that their effect on tumour risk may in part be accounted for by their influence on cell competition. We propose that interventions aimed at modifying the strength and direction of cell competition could induce cancer cell killing and form the basis for novel anticancer therapies.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease SusceptibilityTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorDisease ManagementEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31932757
OpenAlexW4211140416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.