ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020
Current training in percutaneously inserted central catheter (PICC) placement and maintenance for neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective Study of the Application Value Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Technology in Peripheral Deep Venous Catheterization of Neonates.Disease markers · 2022Trial
- Effect of femoral PICC line insertion in neonates with digestive tract disease.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Application value of modified skin expansion in PICC catheterization under the guidance of B-ultrasound in gastrointestinal cancer patients with chemotherapy.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy and WeChat-based health education on patients underwent peripherally inserted central catheter line placement.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the current educational status of percutaneously inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion/ maintenance training for neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) fellows in the United States. STUDY
designA cross-sectional 34-question survey was electronically distributed to NPM fellowship training program directors (PDs) in the United States.
resultsThe response rate was 81.8% (81/99 PD). Most PDs (68.5%) reported that their neonatal intensive care unit has a PICC team. Fellows were PICC team members in 72%. Only 52% of programs offer formal training in PICC placement to fellows; 61.5% of these utilize a standardized curriculum. Dedicated PICC team existence was negatively associated with formal training for PICC insertion and maintenance for fellows (42.0% with PICC team vs. 73.91% without, p = 0.01).
conclusionsWide variation exists in fellow's exposure, education, and competency assessment in PICC-related activities nationally. Development of a standardized curriculum would be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31932714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.