ArticleNature materials2020
The entry of nanoparticles into solid tumours.
Article in Nature materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 636 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
636 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,565 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic innovations of nanomedicine in lymphoma treatment: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The Three Pillars of Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Novel Analysis of Multi-Omics and Clinical Data.Cells · 2024Pooled it
- Redox-manipulating nanocarriers for anticancer drug delivery: a systematic review.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Pooled it
- Nanotherapeutics for enhanced treatments for ovarian cancer: a comprehensive minireview.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Nanomedicine-based cancer immunotherapy: translational barriers, mechanistic strategies, and future perspectives.Drug delivery · 2026Review
- Exploiting the dynamics of hyperthermia-enhanced delivery of thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin to solid tumors.Drug delivery · 2026Article
- Dual-targeted nanotechnology for gynaecological cancers: a comprehensive review of mechanisms and clinical potential.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Activatable MRI nanoprobes for tumor and immune microenvironment imaging: biological mechanisms and translational implications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Modified tumor uptake and biodistribution of nanoparticles coated with small extracellular vesicle membranes derived from distinct tumor cell lines.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2026Article
- Cancer nanomedicine and RNA/Lipid nanoparticle platforms in oncology: developmental evolution, translational barriers, and precision-therapy opportunities.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Shedding light on the cancer cell death mechanism in photodynamic therapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Targeted Thermosensitive CuMedComm · 2026Article
- Feasibility of label-free multiphoton luminescence imaging to track the fate of inhaled gold nanoparticles inBiophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- Mechanism-Driven Design of Metal-Phenolic Networks: From Precision Assembly to Multidimensional Synergistic Therapy for Brain Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Anticancer Peptides: Design Principles, Translational Bottlenecks, and Emerging Opportunities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Nanocarrier Systems for Plant-Derived Bioactives: Design, Biosafety, and Translational Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Reprogramming Photosensitization Mechanisms for Hypoxic Tumor Therapy via Organic Photovoltaic-Inspired Heterojunctions.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- NIR-II conjugated polymers for tumor sonodynamic therapy.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Review
576 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The concept of nanoparticle transport through gaps between endothelial cells (inter-endothelial gaps) in the tumour blood vessel is a central paradigm in cancer nanomedicine. The size of these gaps was found to be up to 2,000 nm. This justified the development of nanoparticles to treat solid tumours as their size is small enough to extravasate and access the tumour microenvironment. Here we show that these inter-endothelial gaps are not responsible for the transport of nanoparticles into solid tumours. Instead, we found that up to 97% of nanoparticles enter tumours using an active process through endothelial cells. This result is derived from analysis of four different mouse models, three different types of human tumours, mathematical simulation and modelling, and two different types of imaging techniques. These results challenge our current rationale for developing cancer nanomedicine and suggest that understanding these active pathways will unlock strategies to enhance tumour accumulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.