Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932656›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2020

A reproducible and safe at-home allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant program: first experience in Central and Southern Europe.

Gonzalo Gutiérrez-García, Montserrat Rovira, Nacira Arab, Cristina Gallego, Joan Sánchez, María Ángeles Álvarez, Pilar Ayora, Ariadna Domenech, Nuria Borràs, Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-Lobato and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [Protective environment strategies for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: progress and prospects].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Gonzalo Gutiérrez-GarcíaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. gonguti@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-8279
Montserrat RoviraBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nacira ArabBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina GallegoBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan SánchezBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María Ángeles ÁlvarezBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pilar AyoraBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ariadna DomenechBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria BorràsBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Gerardo Rodríguez-LobatoBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-0921
Laura RosiñolBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro MarínBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexandra PedrazaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexandra Martínez-RocaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Esther CarceleroDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María Dolores HerreraBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María Teresa SolanoBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carla RamosBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Noemí de LlobetBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna SerrahimaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel LozanoUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan CidUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen MartínezBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
María Suárez-LledóBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Álvaro Urbano-IspizuaBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesc Fernández-AvilésBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015, we implemented an at-home allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) program. Between 2015 and 2018, 252 patients underwent allo-HCT; 41 patients underwent allo-HCT in the at-home program (46% myeloablative; 63% unrelated donor; 32% posttransplant cyclophosphamide), and these patients were compared with 39 in-patients; safety, capacity to release beds for other programs, and economic efficiency cost were evaluated. We observed a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia in the at-home group compared with that in the in-patient group (32% versus 90%; p < 0.0001), whereas the incidence of aspergillosis was similar among groups (at-home 1% versus in-patient 3%; p = 0.5). The at-home patients showed a lower incidence of 1-year severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; 10% versus 29%; p = 0.03). There were no differences in 1-year transplant-related mortality, relapse, or overall survival among groups. The re-admission rate in the at-home group was 7%. The at-home setting was less expensive (9087 €/transplant), and its implementation increased capacity by 10.5 allo-HCTs/year. Moreover, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell program could be established without increasing beds. Thus, our at-home allo-HCT program may be a safe modality to reduce febrile neutropenia and acute GVHD, resulting in lower re-admission rates.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCyclophosphamideEuropeHumansUnrelated DonorsCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.