Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932598›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

The evolution of sexual signaling is linked to odorant receptor tuning in perfume-collecting orchid bees.

Philipp Brand, Ismael A Hinojosa-Díaz, Ricardo Ayala, Michael Daigle, Carmen L Yurrita Obiols, Thomas Eltz, Santiago R Ramírez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Genetics and the Evolution of Prezygotic Isolation.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philipp BrandDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616, Davis, California, USA. pbrand@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4287-4753
Ismael A Hinojosa-DíazDepartamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer Circuito s/n Ciudad Universitaria Delegación Coyoacán, Apartado Postal 70-153, Ciudad de México, 04510, Mexico.
Ricardo AyalaEstación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 21, San Patricio, Jalisco, 48980, Mexico.
Michael DaigleDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616, Davis, California, USA.
Carmen L Yurrita ObiolsCentro de Estudios Conservacionistas, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Avenida La Reforma, 0-63, Guatemala, 01000, Guatemala.
Thomas EltzDepartment of Animal Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstrasse 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Santiago R RamírezDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, Center for Population Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, 95616, Davis, California, USA. sanram@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1306-1315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual signaling is an important reproductive barrier known to evolve early during the formation of new species, but the genetic mechanisms that facilitate the divergence of sexual signals remain elusive. Here we isolate a gene linked to the rapid evolution of a signaling trait in a pair of nascent neotropical orchid bee lineages, Euglossa dilemma and E. viridissima. Male orchid bees acquire chemical compounds from their environment to concoct species-specific perfumes to later expose during courtship. We find that the two lineages acquire chemically distinct perfumes and are reproductively isolated despite low levels of genome-wide differentiation. Remarkably, variation in perfume chemistry coincides with rapid divergence in few odorant receptor (OR) genes. Using functional assays, we demonstrate that the derived variant of Or41 in E. dilemma is specific towards its species-specific major perfume compound, whereas the ancestral variant in E. viridissima is broadly tuned to multiple odorants. Our results show that OR evolution likely played a role in the divergence of sexual communication in natural populations.

Indexed as

Mating Preference, AnimalAnimalsBeesEvolution, MolecularGenetic SpeciationGenetic VariationGenome, InsectMaleOrchidaceaePerfumeReceptors, OdorantSpecies SpecificityPerfumeReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID31932598
PMCPMC6957680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.