Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932466›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2021

Medications Development for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

E Andrew Townsend, S Stevens Negus, Matthew L Banks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex-specific role of the 5-HTNature communications · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. An economon model of drug addiction.Psychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of TRV130 and methadone on fentanyl-vs.-food choice and somatic withdrawal signs in opioid-dependent and post-opioid-dependent rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Sex-specific role for serotonin 5-HTNeuropharmacology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Andrew TownsendDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
S Stevens NegusDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Matthew L BanksDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4949-5246

Funding

VCU Center for Drug Addiction ResearchP30DA033934 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ARON H LICHTMAN · 2014 to 2026
$13.8M
Immunopharmacotherapy for Mitigating Opioid AddictionUH3DA041146 · NIDA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI JANDA, KIM · 2017 to 2019
$4.4M
Medications Development for Stimulant AbuseR01DA026946 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S · 2009 to 2019
$3.7M
Novel fentanyl derivatives as counteracting agents against fentanylUG3DA050311 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, YAN · 2019 to 2020
$2.2M
Immunoantagonist effects on opioid choiceF32DA047026 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI TOWNSEND, EDWARD ANDREW · 2019 to 2020
$95k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA047026NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA033934NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026946NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA050311NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA041146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes methods for preclinical evaluation of candidate medications to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). The review is founded on the propositions that (1) drug self-administration procedures provide the most direct method for assessment of medication effectiveness, (2) procedures that assess choice between opioid and nondrug reinforcers are especially useful, and (3) states of opioid dependence and withdrawal profoundly influence both opioid reinforcement and effects of candidate medications. Effects of opioid medications and vaccines on opioid choice in nondependent and opioid-dependent subjects are reviewed. Various nonopioid medications have also been examined, but none yet have been identified that safely and reliably reduce opioid choice. Future research will focus on (1) strategies for increasing safety and/or effectiveness of opioid medications (e.g., G-protein-biased μ-opioid agonists), and (2) continued development of nonopioid medications (e.g., clonidine) that might serve as adjunctive agents to current opioid medications.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineChoice BehaviorDrug DevelopmentEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcoticsOpioid-Related DisordersReceptors, Opioid, muSelf AdministrationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcoticsReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID31932466
PMCPMC7778216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.