Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932393›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Protocol for a prospective, controlled, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of ambulatory monitoring systems in the prompt detection of hypoxia and during movement.

Carlos Areia, Sarah Vollam, Philippa Piper, Elizabeth King, Jody Ede, Louise Young, Mauro Santos, Marco A F Pimentel, Cristian Roman, Mirae Harford and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos AreiaCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK carlos.morgadoareia@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4668-7069
Sarah VollamCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2835-6271
Philippa PiperAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Elizabeth KingAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Jody EdeCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7289-6991
Louise YoungCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Mauro SantosInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Marco A F PimentelInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Cristian RomanInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Mirae HarfordCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-1577
Akshay ShahRadcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Owen GustafsonAdult Intensive Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Matthew RowlandCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Lionel TarassenkoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Peter J WatkinsonCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-3927
University of Oxford · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2017-10-094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAutomated continuous ambulatory monitoring may provide an alternative to intermittent manual vital signs monitoring. This has the potential to improve frequency of measurements, timely escalation of care and patient safety. However, a major barrier to the implementation of these wearable devices in the ward environment is their uncertain reliability, efficiency and data fidelity. The purpose of this study is to test performance of selected devices in a simulated clinical setting including during movement and low levels of peripheral oxygen saturation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single centre, prospective, controlled, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study to determine the specificity and sensitivity of currently available ambulatory vital signs monitoring equipment in the detection of hypoxia and the effect of movement on data acquisition. We will recruit up to 45 healthy volunteers who will attend a single study visit; starting with a movement phase and followed by the hypoxia exposure phase where we will gradually decrease saturation levels down to 80%. We will simultaneously test one chest patch, one wrist worn only and three wrist worn with finger probe devices against 'clinical standard 'and 'gold standard' references. We will measure peripheral oxygen saturations, pulse rate, heart rate and respiratory rate continuously and arterial blood gases intermittently throughout the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service REC 2 (19/ES/0008). The results will be broadly distributed through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN61535692 registered on 10/06/2019.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectrocardiographyEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansHypoxiaMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMovementProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsVital Signsambulatory monitoringhypoxiavital signswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID31932393
PMCPMC7044954
OpenAlexW2999128967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.