Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932319›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2020

Tracing the Dynamics of Stem Cell Fate.

Lemonia Chatzeli, Benjamin D Simons

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clonal dynamics deviate from neutral drift in zebrafish spermatogenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. rDNA magnification is a unique feature of germline stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. IFT140International journal of oral science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pluripotent and Multipotent Stem Cells and Current Therapeutic Applications: Review.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lemonia ChatzeliWellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Benjamin D SimonsWellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom.
Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Wellcome Trust 098357/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms that regulate the balance between stem cell duplication and differentiation in adult tissues remain in debate. Using a combination of genetic lineage tracing and marker-based assays, the quantitative statistical analysis of clone size and cell composition has provided insights into the patterns of stem cell fate across a variety of tissue types and organisms. These studies have emphasized the role of niche factors and environmental cues in promoting stem cell competence, fate priming, and stochastic renewal programs. At the same time, evidence for injury-induced "cellular reprogramming" has revealed the remarkable flexibility of cell states, allowing progenitors to reacquire self-renewal potential during regeneration. Together, these findings have questioned the nature of stem cell identity and function. Here, focusing on a range of canonical tissue types, we review how quantitative modeling-based approaches have uncovered conserved patterns of stem cell fate and provided new insights into the mechanisms that regulate self-renewal.

Indexed as

Cell LineageGenetic TechniquesAnimalsCell DifferentiationDrosophila melanogasterEpidermisEpitheliumHematopoiesisHomeostasisHumansMaleMiceSpermatozoaStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID31932319
PMCPMC7263083
OpenAlexW2999497682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.