Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31932096›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2020

Omics in Neurodegenerative Disease: Hope or Hype?

Maria E Diaz-Ortiz, Alice S Chen-Plotkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Early immune response of neuronal cells (U87) to heavy metal Cd or Pb exposure.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Environmental neurotoxic pollutants: review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria E Diaz-OrtizDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alice S Chen-PlotkinDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: chenplot@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

UPenn ADCC Biomarker CoreP30AG010124 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DETRE, JOHN A · 1991 to 2020
$35.1M
Project IV "Tackling Heterogeneity of Cognitive Trajectory in LBD"U19AG062418 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TROJANOWSKI, JOHN Q. · 2019 to 2023
$18.1M
Training in Alzheimer’s and Age-Related Neurodegenerative DiseasesT32AG000255 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALICE S CHEN-PLOTKIN, VIRGINIA M LEE · 1997 to 2026
$12.5M
TMEM106B in neurodegenerative diseaseR01NS082265 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN-PLOTKIN, ALICE S · 2013 to 2024
$4.7M
Biomarkers of cognitive decline in Parkinson's DiseaseR01NS115139 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN-PLOTKIN, ALICE S · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Unbiased Approaches to Novel Biomarker Discovery in Parkinson's DiseaseU01NS082134 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN-PLOTKIN, ALICE S · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Towards a blood-based diagnostic panel for confirmation of Parkinson's diseaseU01NS097056 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN-PLOTKIN, ALICE S · 2017 to 2019
$785k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010124NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000255NIA NIH HHS U19 AG062418NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082265NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115139NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS082134NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS097056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 15 years have seen a boom in the use and integration of 'omic' approaches (limited here to genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic techniques) to study neurodegenerative disease in an unprecedented way. We first highlight advances in and the limitations of using such approaches in the neurodegenerative disease literature, with a focus on Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We next discuss how these studies can advance human health in the form of generating leads for downstream mechanistic investigation or yielding polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for prognostication. However, we argue that these approaches constitute a new form of molecular description, analogous to clinical or pathological description, that alone does not hold the key to solving these complex diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisEpigenomeFrontotemporal Lobar DegenerationGenomeHumansMultifactorial InheritanceNeurodegenerative DiseasesParkinson DiseaseTranscriptomeepigenomicgenomicneurodegenerationtranscriptomic

Identifiers

PMID31932096
PMCPMC7065657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.