Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931888›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Correction to: An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study.

O Diaz-Cambronero, G Mazzinari, C L Errando, M J Schultz, B Flor Lorente, N García-Gregorio, M Vila Montañés, Daniel Robles-Hernández, L E Olmedilla Arnal, A Martín-De-Pablos and 2 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

O Diaz-CambroneroDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain. perioperativemedicine@iislafe.es.
G MazzinariPerioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS laFe), Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
C L ErrandoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
M J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B Flor LorenteDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
N García-GregorioDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
M Vila MontañésDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Daniel Robles-HernándezDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
L E Olmedilla ArnalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
A Martín-De-PablosDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
A Marqués MaríPerioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS laFe), Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
M P Argente NavarroDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After publication of our article [1] the authors have notified us that there are changes in the primary outcome and the statistical analysis plan of the study.

Identifiers

PMID31931888
PMCPMC6956552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.