ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2020
Identification and transfer of spatial transcriptomics signatures for cancer diagnosis.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- SRLST: a unified multimodal representation learning framework for spatial transcriptomics analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Representation learning for multi-modal spatially resolved transcriptomics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomics in cancer research: insights into tumorigenesis, diagnosis and therapeutics.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Global scientific growth and thematic development of spatial transcriptomics in oncology research.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Mechanisms of osteopontin-stabilized amorphous calcium phosphate calcification in benign and pre-malignant breast disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- TriCLFF: a multi-modal feature fusion framework using contrastive learning for spatial domain identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Flexible analysis of spatial transcriptomics data (FAST): a deconvolution approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Spatially Resolved Multiomics: Data Analysis from Monoomics to Multiomics.BME frontiers · 2025Review
- Article
- Application of Spatial Transcriptomics in Digestive System Tumors.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Digital analysis of the prostate tumor microenvironment with high-order chromogenic multiplexing.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Cell-specific priors rescue differential gene expression in spatial spot-based technologies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Scoping Review: Methods and Applications of Spatial Transcriptomics in Tumor Research.Cancers · 2024Article
- Spatial landscapes of cancers: insights and opportunities.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Targeting IL-8 and Its Receptors in Prostate Cancer: Inflammation, Stress Response, and Treatment Resistance.Cancers · 2024Review
- Optimizing the design of spatial genomic studies.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Integrating Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals Heterogeneity of Early Pig Skin Development and a Subpopulation with Hair Placode Formation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) regions in clinical biopsies constitutes a diagnostic challenge. Spatial transcriptomics (ST) is an in situ capturing method, which allows quantification and visualization of transcriptomes in individual tissue sections. In the past, studies have shown that breast cancer samples can be used to study their transcriptomes with spatial resolution in individual tissue sections. Previously, supervised machine learning methods were used in clinical studies to predict the clinical outcomes for cancer types.
methodsWe used four publicly available ST breast cancer datasets from breast tissue sections annotated by pathologists as non-malignant, DCIS, or IDC. We trained and tested a machine learning method (support vector machine) based on the expert annotation as well as based on automatic selection of cell types by their transcriptome profiles.
resultsWe identified expression signatures for expert annotated regions (non-malignant, DCIS, and IDC) and build machine learning models. Classification results for 798 expression signature transcripts showed high coincidence with the expert pathologist annotation for DCIS (100%) and IDC (96%). Extending our analysis to include all 25,179 expressed transcripts resulted in an accuracy of 99% for DCIS and 98% for IDC. Further, classification based on an automatically identified expression signature covering all ST spots of tissue sections resulted in prediction accuracy of 95% for DCIS and 91% for IDC.
conclusionsThis concept study suggest that the ST signatures learned from expert selected breast cancer tissue sections can be used to identify breast cancer regions in whole tissue sections including regions not trained on. Furthermore, the identified expression signatures can classify cancer regions in tissue sections not used for training with high accuracy. Expert-generated but even automatically generated cancer signatures from ST data might be able to classify breast cancer regions and provide clinical decision support for pathologists in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.