Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931826›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2020

Participatory ethnobotany and conservation: a methodological case study conducted with quilombola communities in Brazil's Atlantic Forest.

Eliana Rodrigues, Fernando Cassas, Bruno Esteves Conde, Crenilda da Cruz, Eduardo Hortal Pereira Barretto, Ginacil Dos Santos, Glyn Mara Figueira, Luiz Felipe Domingues Passero, Maria Alice Dos Santos, Maria Angélica Silva Gomes and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cultural and ethnobotanical legacy of native potatoes in Colombia.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Eliana RodriguesCenter for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil. 68.eliana@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-6676
Fernando CassasCenter for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil.
Bruno Esteves CondeCenter for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil.
Crenilda da CruzAssociação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo Hortal Pereira BarrettoHerbário Municipal (PMSP) - Secretaria Municipal do Verde e do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ginacil Dos SantosAssociação da Comunidade dos Remanescentes de Quilombo da Fazenda, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil.
Glyn Mara FigueiraCentro Pluridisciplinar de Pesquisas Químicas, Biológicas e Agrícolas [CPQBA] - UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Felipe Domingues PasseroInstitute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Vicente, SP, Brazil.
Maria Alice Dos SantosAssociação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil.
Maria Angélica Silva GomesAssociação dos Remanescentes de Quilombo do Cambury, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil.
Priscila MattaAmerindian Studies Center, Universidade de São Paulo (CEstA-USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Priscila YazbekCenter for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil.
Ricardo José Francischetti GarciaHerbário Municipal (PMSP) - Secretaria Municipal do Verde e do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Silvestre BragaAssociação da Comunidade dos Remanescentes de Quilombo da Fazenda, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil.
Sonia AragakiInstituto de Botânica (IBt), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sumiko HondaHerbário Municipal (PMSP) - Secretaria Municipal do Verde e do Meio Ambiente, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thamara SauiniCenter for Ethnobotanical and Ethnopharmacological Studies (CEE) - Department of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Professor Artur Riedel, 275, Jardim Eldorado, Diadema, SP, 09972-270, Brazil.
Viviane S da Fonseca-KruelInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tamara TicktinDepartment of Botany, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRSecretaria Municipal do Verde e do Meio Ambiente · BRInstituto Biológico · BRInstituto de Botânica · BRInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 400802/2016-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/ 12046-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough multiple studies advocate the advantages of participatory research approaches for ethnoscience, few provide solid contributions from case studies that involve residents in all of the project phases. We present a case study of a participatory approach whose aim is to register ethnobotanical knowledge on the use of plants in two quilombola communities (maroon communities), an important biodiversity hotspot in the Atlantic Forest, Southeast Brazil. Our aim is to provide tools that will empower decision-making related to sustainable use and management among residents.

methodsIn phase I, the objectives and activities were defined in meetings with residents to carry out ethnobotanical surveys between two quilombola communities-the Quilombo da Fazenda (QF) and Quilombo do Cambury (QC). In phase II, we offered community partners training courses on how to collect plants and ethnobotanical data. In coordination with the university team and using ethnobotanical methods, community partners interviewed specialists on plants and their uses. In phase III, using the participatory mapping method, residents indicated plot locations and collected plants to calculate the Conservation Priority Index for native species recorded in phase II.

resultsIn 178 days of fieldwork, two community partners from the QF and three from the QC selected 8 and 11 respondents who reported 175 and 195 plant species, respectively, corresponding to 9 ethnobotanical categories. Based on requests from the local community, booklets and videos with these data were collaboratively produced. A large percentage of species were found to be of great conservation priority-82.1% in the QC and 62.5% in the QF. Virola bicuhyba, Cedrela fissilis, Plinia edulis, and Tabebuia cassinoides are the species most at risk and will be the focus of phase IV, when a participatory management plan will be carried out. Additionally, we present both challenges and opportunities with the hope that others can learn from our successes and failures.

conclusionsOur experience shows that it is possible to train community members who wish to document their knowledge to support the process of ensuring that local knowledge is highly regarded, further ensuring its perpetuation. In this context, the project may be of great interest to development programs in promoting community-based management strategies for useful plants.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEthnobotanyBiodiversityBrazilCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEndangered SpeciesEthnicityFemaleForestsHumansMaleAtlantic forestConservationEthnobotanyParticipatory managementParticipatory research

Identifiers

PMID31931826
PMCPMC6958751
OpenAlexW2999448926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.