Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931823›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2020

Methods to promote equity in health resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries: an overview.

James Love-Koh, Susan Griffin, Edward Kataika, Paul Revill, Sibusiso Sibandze, Simon Walker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Methods to Quantify the Importance of Parameters for Model Updating and Distributional Adaptation.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  18. Effect of Remote and Virtual Technology on Home Dialysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James Love-KohCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England. james.love-koh@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9009-5346
Susan GriffinCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England.
Edward KataikaEast, Central and Southern Africa Health Community, Arusha, Tanzania.
Paul RevillCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England.
Sibusiso SibandzeEast, Central and Southern Africa Health Community, Arusha, Tanzania.
Simon WalkerCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P028004/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unfair differences in healthcare access, utilisation, quality or health outcomes exist between and within countries around the world. Improving health equity is a stated objective for many governments and international organizations. We provide an overview of the major tools that have been developed to measure, evaluate and promote health equity, along with the data required to operationalise them.Methods are organised into four key policy questions facing decision-makers: (i) what is the current level of inequity in health; (ii) does government health expenditure benefit the worst-off; (iii) can government health expenditure more effectively promote equity; and (iv) which interventions provide the best value for money in reducing inequity.Benefit incidence analysis can be used to estimate the distribution of current public health sector expenditure, with geographical resource allocation formulae and health system reform being the main government policy levers for improving equity. Techniques from the economic evaluation literature, such as extended and distributional cost-effectiveness analysis can be used to identify 'best buy' interventions from a health equity perspective. A range of inequality metrics, from gap measures and slope indices to concentration indices and regression analysis, can be applied to these approaches to evaluate changes in equity.Methods from the economics literature can provide policymakers with a toolkit for addressing multiple aspects of health equity, from outcomes to financial protection, and can be adapted to accommodate data commonly available in low- and middle-income settings.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth EquityHealth Care RationingHumansBenefit incidence analysisEconomic evaluationHealth equityHealth inequalitiesResource allocation

Identifiers

PMID31931823
PMCPMC6958737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.