ArticleBMC medicine2020
Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018.
Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and a nutrient profiling tax based on Nutri-Score on consumer food purchases in a virtual supermarket: a randomised controlled trial.Public health nutrition · 2022Trial
- Policy Progress in Using Economic Policy Instruments to Improve Nutrition: Challenges and Opportunities.Health economics · 2026Review
- Evidence Drift in Early Childhood Caries Research: A Conceptual Six-Domain Causal-Translation Framework.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genetic and Environmental Influences on Free Sugar and Nonnutritive Sweetener Intake in Toddlerhood and Middle Childhood Using Data from the Gemini Twin Cohort: Findings from the SWEET Project.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- A scoping review of obesity policies and reimbursement landscape: global insights and lessons for Thailand.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Childhood Obesity and the Future Burden of Adult Cardiometabolic Disease: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Impact of Fiscal Policy for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Reducing the Burden of Disease and Healthcare Costs in Brazil: A Simulation Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Evolving Sweet Preferences: Temporal Trends in Australian Non-Alcoholic Beverage Sales from 1997 to 2024.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Non-nutritive sweeteners and body weight in children with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a critical narrative review of current evidence, methodological challenges, biological mechanisms, and clinical implications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Association of low-calorie sweetened product consumption and intakes of free sugar and dietary patterns in UK adults: a national study from 2008 to 2019.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The impact of various forms of non-alcoholic beverage taxation on sales of non-alcoholic beverages and sugar in the Netherlands: a modelling study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The UK Food Environment: A Systematic Review of Domains, Methodologies, and Outcomes.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Review
- Population health impacts from the taxation of salt and sugar in the United Kingdom.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Association of low-calorie sweetened product consumption and intakes of free sugar and ultra-processed foods in UK children: a national study from 2008 to 2019.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- The impact of tiered soft drink taxes in Europe on mean sales-weighted sugar content of soft drinks: a quasi-experimental study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Sugar Reformulation in Solid Foods: Limitations and Challenges.Nutrition bulletin · 2025Article
- Supply- and demand-side drivers of the change in the sugar density of food purchased between 2015 and 2018 in Great Britain.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Modelling the potential impact of food taxes based on nutrient and energy content in the UK: a simulation study.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Unpacking food environment policy landscapes for healthier diets in "emerging" countries: the case of Viet Nam.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages by Polish Young Adults: A Preliminary Study on the Importance of Sugar Tax Familiarity and Health Effects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe consumption of free sugars in the UK is more than double the guideline intake for adults and close to triple for children, with soft drinks representing a significant proportion. The aim of this study was to assess how individual soft drink companies and consumers have responded to calls to reduce sugar consumption, including the soft drink industry levy (SDIL), between 2015 and 2018.
methodsThis was an annual cross-sectional study using nutrient composition data of 7377 products collected online, paired with volume sales data for 195 brands offered by 57 companies. The main outcome measures were sales volume, sugar content and volume of sugars sold by company and category, expressed in total and per capita per day terms.
resultsBetween 2015 and 2018, the volume of sugars sold per capita per day from soft drinks declined by 30%, equivalent to a reduction of 4.6 g per capita per day. The sales-weighted mean sugar content of soft drinks fell from 4.4 g/100 ml in 2015 to 2.9 g/100 ml in 2018. The total volume sales of soft drinks that are subject to the SDIL (i.e. contain more than 5 g/100 ml of sugar) fell by 50%, while volume sales of low- and zero-sugar (< 5 g/100 ml) drinks rose by 40%.
conclusionAction by the soft drinks industry to reduce sugar in products and change their product portfolios, coupled with changes in consumer purchasing, has led to a significant reduction in the total volume and per capita sales of sugars sold in soft drinks in the UK. The rate of change accelerated between 2017 and 2018, which also implies that the implementation of the SDIL acted as an extra incentive for companies to reformulate above and beyond what was already being done as part of voluntary commitments to reformulation, or changes in sales driven by consumer preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.