Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931794›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2020

Neuromuscular blocking agents for acute respiratory distress syndrome: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhongjun Zheng, Libing Jiang, Song Zhang, Christophe Guervilly, Mao Zhang, Xia Feng, Jianbo Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Myorelaxants in ARDS patients.Intensive care medicine · 2020
    Review
  8. COVID-19: Short and Long-Term Effects of Hospitalization on Muscular Weakness in the Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhongjun ZhengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Libing JiangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, China. 2515168@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-2345
Song ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Christophe GuervillyMedical Intensive Care Unit, North Hospital, APHM, Marseille, France.
Mao ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, China. z2jzk@zju.edu.cn.
Xia FengDepartment of Respiratory, The Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Jianbo DingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiefang road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNAix-Marseille Université · FRChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNThird People's Hospital of Hangzhou · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsThe aim of this study is investigating the benefits and harms of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

methodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials comparing NMBAs to any other comparator. We pooled data using relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane tool and levels of evidence using the GRADE method.

resultsFinally, six RCTs (n = 1557 patients) were eligible for analysis. The results showed NMBAs use was not associated with reduced 28 days mortality (RR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.06; P = 0.11), 90 days mortality (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.04; P = 0.16), and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.03; P = 0.13) in patients with ARDS. However, 21-28 days mortality was slightly lower in patients received NMBAs (RR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99; P = 0.04; I

conclusionIn patients with respiratory distress syndrome, NMBAs may be beneficial in reverse refractory hypoxemia and may be associated with reduced short-term mortality and incidence of barotrauma. However, there is no significant effects of NMBAs on mid-term and long-term mortality, and further studies are required.

Indexed as

HumansNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Distress SyndromeNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)Meta-analysisMortalityNeuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs)

Identifiers

PMID31931794
PMCPMC6958940
OpenAlexW3000877420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.