Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931761›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study.

C Miani, A Ludwig, J Breckenkamp, O Sauzet, I-M Doyle, C Hoeller-Holtrichter, J Spallek, O Razum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Caesarean section and obesity in young adult offspring: Update of a systematic review with meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Racial and Ethnic Disparity in the Administration of General Anesthesia.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C MianiDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. celine.miani@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3835-0287
A LudwigDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
J BreckenkampDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
O SauzetDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
I-M DoyleDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
C Hoeller-HoltrichterDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
J SpallekDepartment of Public Health, Institute for Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany.
O RazumDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

BMBF 01ER1202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with a migration background are reportedly at a higher risk of emergency caesarean section. There is evidence that this is due in part to suboptimal antenatal care use and quality of care. Despite the fact that migrant women and descendants of migrants are often at risk of socioeconomic disadvantage, there is, in comparison, scarce and incomplete evidence on the role of socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for emergency caesarean delivery. We therefore investigate whether and how migration background and two markers of socioeconomic position affect the risk of an emergency caesarean section and whether they interact with each other.

methodsIn 2013-2016, we recruited women during the perinatal period in Bielefeld, Germany, collecting data on health and socioeconomic and migration background, as well as routine perinatal data. We studied associations between migration background (1st generation migrant, 2nd/3rd generation woman, no migration background), socioeconomic status (educational attainment and net monthly household income), and the outcome emergency caesarean section.

resultsOf the 881 participants, 21% (n = 185) had an emergency caesarean section. Analyses showed no association between having an emergency caesarean section and migration status or education. Women in the lowest (< 800€/month) and second lowest (between 800 and 1750€/month) income categories were more likely (aOR: 1.96, CI: 1.01-3.81; and aOR: 2.36, CI: 1.27-4.40, respectively) to undergo an emergency caesarean section than women in the higher income groups.

conclusionsMigration status and education did not explain heterogeneity in mode of birth. Having a low household income, however, increased the chances of emergency caesarean section and thereby contributed towards producing health disadvantages. Awareness of these findings and measures to correct these inequalities could help to improve the quality of obstetric care.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultCesarean SectionCohort StudiesEmergenciesFemaleGermanyHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareTransients and MigrantsAcculturationBirth cohortCaesarean sectionEducationEmergencyGermanyIncomeMigrationObstetric careSocioeconomic determinants

Identifiers

PMID31931761
PMCPMC6958756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.