Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931742›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Midwives' engagement in smoking- and alcohol-prevention in prenatal care before and after the introduction of practice guidelines in Switzerland: comparison of survey findings from 2008 and 2018.

Sakari Lemola, Anna Gkiouleka, Natalie Urfer-Maurer, Alexander Grob, Katharina Tritten Schwarz, Yvonne Meyer-Leu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Screening for Alcohol Use in Pregnancy: a Review of Current Practices and Perspectives.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sakari LemolaDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, UK, University Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. s.lemola@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-6194
Anna GkioulekaDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, UK, University Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Natalie Urfer-MaurerDepartment of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander GrobDepartment of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, CH-3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Katharina Tritten SchwarzDepartment of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, CH-3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Yvonne Meyer-LeuSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), Avenue de Beaumont 21, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHUniversity of Warwick · GBHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

The Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF) G.HFPS.0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption during pregnancy negatively impacts fetal health. Health agencies across countries have developed specific guidelines for health professionals in perinatal care to strengthen their role in smoking and alcohol use prevention. One such example is the "Guideline on Screening and Counselling for prevention of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption before, during, and after pregnancy" introduced by the Swiss Midwives Association in 2011. The current study assesses the changes in midwives' engagement in smoking and alcohol use prevention before (2008) and after the introduction of the Guideline (2018). Further, the current study examines differences across regions (German vs. French speaking regions), graduation years (before and after the introduction of the Guideline) and different work settings (hospital vs. self-employed).

methodsSurvey data were collected in 2008 (n = 366) and in 2018 (n = 459). Differences in how midwives engaged in smoking and alcohol use prevention between 2008 and 2018 were assessed with chi-square tests, as were differences across German and French speaking regions, graduation years (before and after the introduction of the Guideline) and across different work settings (working in hospitals or as self-employed).

resultsAn increase in midwives' awareness of the risks of consuming even small quantities of cigarettes and alcohol for the unborn child between 2008 and 2018 is evident. Explaining the risks to pregnant women who smoke or use alcohol remained the most frequently reported prevention strategy. However, engagement with more extensive smoking and alcohol use preventive strategies across the whole course of pregnancy, such as assisting women in the elaboration of a plan to stop smoking/alcohol use, remained limited.

conclusionsSeven years after its introduction, the effectiveness of the Guideline in increasing midwives' engagement in smoking and alcohol use prevention appears limited despite midwives' increased awareness.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMidwiferyPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareSmoking PreventionStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandAlcohol use preventionMidwiferyMidwivesPerinatal careSmoking prevention

Identifiers

PMID31931742
PMCPMC6958580
OpenAlexW3005381751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.