Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931727›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Frequent attenders in the German healthcare system: determinants of high utilization of primary care services. Results from the cross-sectional German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS).

Melanie Luppa, Jan Giersdorf, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Franziska Prütz, Alexander Rommel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association betweenBMJ open gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. More GP Consultations by Violence Victims: Results from the Representative German DEGS1 Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melanie LuppaInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jan GiersdorfDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Steffi Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska PrützDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander RommelDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. RommelA@rki.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7253-0535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, patients are consulting general practitioners increasingly frequently, resulting in a high burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to identify factors associated with frequent primary care attendance in the German healthcare system.

methodsThe German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS) is part of Germany's national health monitoring, and includes a large representative sample of the German population aged 18-79 years. We defined the 10% of participants with the highest number of general practitioner contacts in the preceding 12 months as frequent attenders of primary care services. Binary logistic regression models with average marginal effects were used to identify potential determinants for frequent use of primary care services.

resultsThe sample comprised 7956 participants. Significant effects on frequent use of primary care were observed for low socioeconomic status, stressful life events, factors related to medical need for care such as medically diagnosed chronic conditions and for subjective health. In the full model, the number of non-communicable diseases and subjective health status had the strongest effect on frequent primary care use. We found an interaction effect suggesting that the association between subjective health status and frequent attendance vanishes with a higher number of non-communicable diseases.

conclusionsWe observed strong associations between frequent primary care attendance and medical need for care as well as subjective health-related factors. These findings suggest that better coordination of care may be a preferred method to manage health services utilization and to avoid redundant examinations and uncoordinated clinical pathways. Further research is needed to clarify moderating and mediating factors contributing to high utilization of primary care services.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseDiagnostic Self EvaluationSocial ClassStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedEducational StatusFemaleGermanyHealth ServicesHealth StatusHumansIncomeLogistic ModelsMaleComorbidityFamily practiceFrequent attendanceGeneral practitionerHealth servicesHealth surveysMental disordersNeeds and demandPrimary careSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31931727
PMCPMC6958724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.