ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020
Deep neural networks for human microRNA precursor detection.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNAs in endometriosis: bioinformatics resources, machine learning strategies, and multi-omics perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- GENNUS: generative approaches for nucleotide sequences enhance mirtron classification.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- BERT-DomainAFP: Antifreeze protein recognition and classification model based on BERT and structural domain annotation.iScience · 2025Article
- WP-MOD: A multi-omics and taxonomy database for woody plants.Plant communications · 2025Article
- pmiRScan: a LightGBM based method for prediction of animal pre-miRNAs.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- ResUbiNet: A Novel Deep Learning Architecture for Ubiquitination Site Prediction.Current genomics · 2025Article
- Advancing miRNA cancer research through artificial intelligence: from biomarker discovery to therapeutic targeting.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning explains the biology of branched glycans from single-cell sequencing data.iScience · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Female Reproductive Function Using Ultrasound: A Review.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2022Review
- Machine Learning Based Methods and Best Practices of microRNA-Target Prediction and Validation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides Prediction method based on sequence multidimensional feature embedding.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence for biotechnology and applied microbiology: Exploring research hotspots and frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- CL-ACP: a parallel combination of CNN and LSTM anticancer peptide recognition model.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for pre-miRNA classification.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in a variety of biological processes by regulating gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. So, the discovery of new miRNAs has become a popular task in biological research. Since the experimental identification of miRNAs is time-consuming, many computational tools have been developed to identify miRNA precursor (pre-miRNA). Most of these computation methods are based on traditional machine learning methods and their performance depends heavily on the selected features which are usually determined by domain experts. To develop easily implemented methods with better performance, we investigated different deep learning architectures for the pre-miRNAs identification.
resultsIn this work, we applied convolution neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN) to predict human pre-miRNAs. We combined the sequences with the predicted secondary structures of pre-miRNAs as input features of our models, avoiding the feature extraction and selection process by hand. The models were easily trained on the training dataset with low generalization error, and therefore had satisfactory performance on the test dataset. The prediction results on the same benchmark dataset showed that our models outperformed or were highly comparable to other state-of-the-art methods in this area. Furthermore, our CNN model trained on human dataset had high prediction accuracy on data from other species.
conclusionsDeep neural networks (DNN) could be utilized for the human pre-miRNAs detection with high performance. Complex features of RNA sequences could be automatically extracted by CNN and RNN, which were used for the pre-miRNAs prediction. Through proper regularization, our deep learning models, although trained on comparatively small dataset, had strong generalization ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.