Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931697›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in beef cattle revealed by genome wide association studies of imputed whole genome sequence variants: II: carcass merit traits.

Yining Wang, Feng Zhang, Robert Mukiibi, Liuhong Chen, Michael Vinsky, Graham Plastow, John Basarab, Paul Stothard, Changxi Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sequence-based GWAS meta-analyses for beef production traits.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-wide association study of mature cow size traits in American Angus cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of Mutations in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Signature of Selection Analysis Reveals Candidate Genes Related to Climate Adaptation and Production Traits in Lao Native Goats.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yining WangLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.
Feng ZhangLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.
Robert MukiibiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Liuhong ChenLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.
Michael VinskyLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada.
Graham PlastowDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
John BasarabAlberta Agriculture and Forestry, Lacombe Research and Development Centre, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada.
Paul StothardDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Changxi LiLacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada. changxi.li@canada.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-7047
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAAgriculture Food and Rural Development · CA

Funding

Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency 2014F047R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome wide association studies (GWAS) were conducted on 7,853,211 imputed whole genome sequence variants in a population of 3354 to 3984 animals from multiple beef cattle breeds for five carcass merit traits including hot carcass weight (HCW), average backfat thickness (AFAT), rib eye area (REA), lean meat yield (LMY) and carcass marbling score (CMAR). Based on the GWAS results, genetic architectures of the carcass merit traits in beef cattle were elucidated.

resultsThe distributions of DNA variant allele substitution effects approximated a bell-shaped distribution for all the traits while the distribution of additive genetic variances explained by single DNA variants conformed to a scaled inverse chi-squared distribution to a greater extent. At a threshold of P-value < 10

conclusionsThe GWAS results have shown that the carcass merit traits are controlled by a few DNA variants with large effects and many DNA variants with small effects. Nucleotide polymorphisms in regulatory, synonymous, and missense functional classes have relatively larger impacts per sequence variant on the variation of carcass merit traits. The genetic architecture as revealed by the GWAS will improve our understanding on genetic controls of carcass merit traits in beef cattle.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociRed MeatAnimalsCattleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Association StudiesInheritance PatternsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome SequencingBeef cattleCarcass merit traitsGenetic architectureGenome wide association studiesImputed whole genome sequence variants

Identifiers

PMID31931697
PMCPMC6958779
OpenAlexW3010941092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.