Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31931615›Full record

Observational studyCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2020

Tracking Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Completion Among Medicare Beneficiaries to Inform the Efforts of a National Initiative.

Matthew D Ritchey, Sha Maresh, Jessica McNeely, Thomas Shaffer, Sandra L Jackson, Steven J Keteyian, Clinton A Brawner, Mary A Whooley, Tiffany Chang, Haley Stolp and 2 more

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 192 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05328375 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Implementing Telehealth-enhanced Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (THCR) Among Acute Coronary Syndrome Survivors: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled10ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial InfarctionArmsTelehealth-enhanced Hybrid CR, Traditional CR
NCT05562037 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Stepped Care vs Center-based Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation for Older Frail Adults Living in Rural MA

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeter Lindenauer, MDRan2022 to 2025Enrolled139ConditionsAngina, Stable, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsStepped Care
NCT05610462 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Exercise in Aortic Dissection Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2023 to 2024Enrolled126ConditionsThoracic Aortic DissectionArmsGuided Exercise Training Program, Usual Care
NCT06030115 completednot on this map

Effects of a Physical Therapist-driven Individualized Hybrid Model of the Exercise Component of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes: a Prospective Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorGood Shepherd Integrated Healthcare SystemsRan2019 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsCardiac Surgery, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft CABG, Stent, Valve ReplacementArmsExercise Component Of Cardiac Rehabilitation (Hybrid Model) Intensity Recovery Progression Protocol (IRPP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A Confirmatory Factory Analysis of the Exercise Sensitivity Questionnaire (ESQ).Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew D RitcheyDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (M.D.R., S.L.J., T.C., H.S., L.S.).
Sha MareshCenter for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD (S.M., J.M., T.S.).
Jessica McNeelyCenter for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD (S.M., J.M., T.S.).
Thomas ShafferCenter for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD (S.M., J.M., T.S.).
Sandra L JacksonDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (M.D.R., S.L.J., T.C., H.S., L.S.).
Steven J KeteyianDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan (S.J.K., C.A.B.).
Clinton A BrawnerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan (S.J.K., C.A.B.).
Mary A WhooleySchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (M.W.).
Tiffany ChangDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (M.D.R., S.L.J., T.C., H.S., L.S.).
Haley StolpDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (M.D.R., S.L.J., T.C., H.S., L.S.).
Linda SchiebDivision for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (M.D.R., S.L.J., T.C., H.S., L.S.).
Janet WrightOffice of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC (J.W.).

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite cardiac rehabilitation (CR) being shown to improve health outcomes among patients with heart disease, its use has been suboptimal. In response, the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative developed a road map to improve CR use, including increasing participation rates to ≥70% by 2022. This observational study provides current estimates to measure progress and identifies the populations and regions most at risk for CR service underutilization. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were CR eligible in 2016, and assessed CR participation (≥1 CR session attended), timely initiation (participation within 21 days of event), and completion (≥36 sessions attended) through 2017. Measures were assessed overall, by beneficiary characteristics and geography, and by primary CR-qualifying event type (acute myocardial infarction hospitalization; coronary artery bypass surgery; heart valve repair/replacement; percutaneous coronary intervention; or heart/heart-lung transplant). Among 366 103 CR-eligible beneficiaries, 89 327 (24.4%) participated in CR, of whom 24.3% initiated within 21 days and 26.9% completed CR. Eligibility was highest in the East South Central Census Division (14.8 per 1000). Participation decreased with increasing age, was lower among women (18.9%) compared with men (28.6%; adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.90-0.93]) was lower among Hispanics (13.2%) and non-Hispanic blacks (13.6%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (25.8%; adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.63 [0.61-0.66] and 0.70 [0.67-0.72], respectively), and varied by hospital referral region and Census Division (range: 18.6% [East South Central] to 39.1% [West North Central]) and by qualifying event type (range: 7.1% [acute myocardial infarction without procedure] to 55.3% [coronary artery bypass surgery only]). Timely initiation varied by geography and qualifying event type; completion varied by geography.

conclusionsOnly 1 in 4 CR-eligible Medicare beneficiaries participated in CR and marked disparities were observed. Reinforcement of current effective strategies and development of new strategies will be critical to address the noted disparities and achieve the 70% participation goal.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCardiac RehabilitationDatabases, FactualEligibility DeterminationFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHeart DiseasesHumansInsurance BenefitsMaleMedicareMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Carecardiac rehabilitationcoronary artery bypassheart diseasesmyocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID31931615
PMCPMC8091573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.