Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31930580›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2020

Genome ancestry mosaics reveal multiple and cryptic contributors to cultivated banana.

Guillaume Martin, Céline Cardi, Gautier Sarah, Sébastien Ricci, Christophe Jenny, Emmanuel Fondi, Xavier Perrier, Jean-Christophe Glaszmann, Angélique D'Hont, Nabila Yahiaoui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Banana breeding by genome design.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Striking variation in chromosome structure withinFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guillaume MartinCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1801-7500
Céline CardiCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Gautier SarahAGAP, Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Sébastien RicciAGAP, Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Christophe JennyCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Emmanuel FondiCARBAP, Rue Dinde, No. 110, Bonanjo, BP 832, Douala, Cameroon.
Xavier PerrierCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Christophe GlaszmannCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Angélique D'HontCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.
Nabila YahiaouiCIRAD, UMR AGAP, F-34398, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridizations between closely related species commonly occur in the domestication process of many crops. Banana cultivars are derived from such hybridizations between species and subspecies of the Musa genus that have diverged in various tropical Southeast Asian regions and archipelagos. Among the diploid and triploid hybrids generated, those with seedless parthenocarpic fruits were selected by humans and thereafter dispersed through vegetative propagation. Musa acuminata subspecies contribute to most of these cultivars. We analyzed sequence data from 14 M. acuminata wild accessions and 10 M. acuminata-based cultivars, including diploids and one triploid, to characterize the ancestral origins along their chromosomes. We used multivariate analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism clustering and identified five ancestral groups as contributors to these cultivars. Four of these corresponded to known M. acuminata subspecies. A fifth group, found only in cultivars, was defined based on the 'Pisang Madu' cultivar and represented two uncharacterized genetic pools. Diverse ancestral contributions along cultivar chromosomes were found, resulting in mosaics with at least three and up to five ancestries. The commercially important triploid Cavendish banana cultivar had contributions from at least one of the uncharacterized genetic pools and three known M. acuminata subspecies. Our results highlighted that cultivated banana origins are more complex than expected - involving multiple hybridization steps - and also that major wild banana ancestors have yet to be identified. This study revealed the extent to which admixture has framed the evolution and domestication of a crop plant.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticMusaadmixturediversitygenome ancestryhybridizationMusa acuminata

Identifiers

PMID31930580
PMCPMC7317953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.