Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31930331›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

The emergence of sequence-dependent structural motifs in stretched, torsionally constrained DNA.

Jack W Shepherd, Robert J Greenall, Matt I J Probert, Agnes Noy, Mark C Leake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jack W ShepherdDepartment of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Robert J GreenallDepartment of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Matt I J ProbertDepartment of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Agnes NoyDepartment of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Mark C LeakeDepartment of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The double-helical structure of DNA results from canonical base pairing and stacking interactions. However, variations from steady-state conformations resulting from mechanical perturbations in cells have physiological relevance but their dependence on sequence remains unclear. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations showing sequence differences result in markedly different structural motifs upon physiological twisting and stretching. We simulate overextension on different sequences of DNA ((AA)12, (AT)12, (CC)12 and (CG)12) with supercoiling densities at 200 and 50 mM salt concentrations. We find that DNA denatures in the majority of stretching simulations, surprisingly including those with over-twisted DNA. GC-rich sequences are observed to be more stable than AT-rich ones, with the specific response dependent on the base pair order. Furthermore, we find that (AT)12 forms stable periodic structures with non-canonical hydrogen bonds in some regions and non-canonical stacking in others, whereas (CG)12 forms a stacking motif of four base pairs independent of supercoiling density. Our results demonstrate that 20-30% DNA extension is sufficient for breaking B-DNA around and significantly above cellular supercoiling, and that the DNA sequence is crucial for understanding structural changes under mechanical stress. Our findings have important implications for the activities of protein machinery interacting with DNA in all cells.

Indexed as

Base PairingBase SequenceBiophysical PhenomenaDNAGC Rich SequenceHydrogen BondingMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular StructureNucleic Acid ConformationDNA

Identifiers

PMID31930331
PMCPMC7038985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.