ArticleJCO precision oncology2018
Future of Evidence Synthesis in Precision Oncology: Between Systematic Reviews and Biocuration.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proof-of-concept study of a small language model chatbot for breast cancer decision support - a transparent, source-controlled, explainable and data-secure approach.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Collaborative, Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Cancer Variants Through Virtual Molecular Tumor Boards Informs Local Clinical Practices.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Review
- Evidence-Based Network Approach to Recommending Targeted Cancer Therapies.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
- UniProt genomic mapping for deciphering functional effects of missense variants.Human mutation · 2019Article
- Adapting crowdsourced clinical cancer curation in CIViC to the ClinGen minimum variant level data community-driven standards.Human mutation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.