Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31930079›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

A survey of sharps injuries and occupational infections among healthcare workers in Shanghai.

Jiabing Lin, Xiaodong Gao, Yangwen Cui, Wei Sun, Yan Shen, Qingfeng Shi, Xiang Chen, Bijie Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiabing LinDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiaodong GaoDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yangwen CuiDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Wei SunDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yan ShenDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Qingfeng ShiDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiang ChenDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Bijie HuDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) are at greater risk of occupational exposure to sharp injuries in their daily routine work, which is extremely worrying due to the potential risk of transmitting bloodborne pathogens. This study aims to assess what procedures and factors present the greatest risk of sharp injuries to HCWs in Shanghai and to provide an evidence base for improving measures to reduce sharps injuries.

methodsA cross-sectional study was administered to all HCW who might be exposed to sharp instruments in 81 hospitals in Shanghai. According to the voluntary, investigate as many HCWs as possible and get feedbacks N=61,309. The survey addressed the sharp injury (SI) incidents, SIs of common instruments, SIs of common locations, SIs of operating procedures, SIs of common instruments and common sources of SI occurrences. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program.

resultsA total of 61,309 HCWs were surveyed for this study, and 935 (1.53%) HCWs experienced the various types of sharp injuries in one month. Of the 1,140 sharp injuries, 292 (25.61%) sharp injuries were reported, and 815 (71.49%) sharp injuries were traced to their sources. Interns experienced the highest proportion of sharps injuries (4.12%). General wards were the most common location where sharp injuries occurred to HCWs (36.05%), while disposable syringes were the most common medical devices that caused sharp injuries (32.11%). Nurses, doctors and logistical workers who did not receive relevant training had a higher incidence of SI (4.40%, 4.95% and 4.03%, respectively) than those who received training (1.58%, 1.03% and 0.67%, respectively, P<0.001). HBV infection was the main source of exposure to sharp injuries, with scalpel cuts being the most common related occurrence.

conclusionsSharp injuries occur among HCWs in Shanghai dented optimism. There are multiple high-risk factors for SI and exposure to blood-borne pathogens in their work such as interns, general wards, disposable syringes, and lack of relevant training. HBV infection was the main source of exposure to sharp injuries. As such, medical institutions shall pay closer attention to this topic.

Indexed as

current situation analysisHealthcare workers (HCWs)incidence ratesoccupational infectionrisk factorssharps injuries

Identifiers

PMID31930079
PMCPMC6944561
OpenAlexW2983881962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.