Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31930060›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019

Comparison of a novel handheld accelerometer-based navigation system and conventional instrument for performing distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Xingquan Xu, Peilai Liu, Zhenfeng Yuan, Dawei Wang, Qunshan Lu, Zhe Zhang, Qing Jiang, Dongquan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xingquan XuState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Peilai LiuQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Zhenfeng YuanLiaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Dawei WangLiaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Qunshan LuQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Zhe ZhangState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Qing JiangState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Dongquan ShiState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of a novel, hand-held, accelerometer-based navigation system (i-JOIN knee navigation system) for distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrument.

methodsA multi-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. A total of 79 consecutive patients scheduled for primary TKA were enrolled and divided into navigation group (39 patients) and conventional group (40 patients). Post-operative mechanical and component position were evaluated through full-leg weight bearing X-ray. Pre-operatively and 1 week post-operatively, adverse events were recorded. Intraoperative surgical time and blood loss were also recorded.

resultsThe mean outlier of 180° neutral mechanical axis was 1.60° (SD 1.11°) in navigation group and 2.30° (SD 2.06°) in conventional group (P=0.0917). Thirty-eight patients (97.4%) in navigation group and 35 patients (87.5%) in conventional group had an alignment which was ≤3°away from the neutral mechanical axis (P=0.2007). α angle between the navigation group and conventional group was not statistically different (89.81°

conclusionsi-JOIN knee navigation system had equivalent results for distal femoral resection in TKA compared with the conventional technique.

Indexed as

conventional instrumenti-JOIN knee navigation systemmechanical axis, accuracyTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID31930060
PMCPMC6944558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.