ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019
Probable factors affecting clinical outcomes of internal jugular vein stenosis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cerebral blood flow alterations in non-auditory tinnitus: implications for cerebral venous congestion pathophysiology.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Approach versus Landmark-Based Middle Approach for Internal Jugular Vein Puncture in Resident Training.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Complication of stent displacement from the internal jugular vein to the pulmonary artery after jugular vein stenting in the treatment of intracranial hypertension: a case report.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Headache in Patients With Non-Thrombotic Internal Jugular Vein Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics and Associated Risk Factors in a Retrospective Study of 283 Cases.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting on correcting internal jugular vein and cerebral venous sinus stenosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- Cerebral Venous-Associated Brain Damage May Lead to Anxiety and Depression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Use of patient-reported data in determining factors contributing to internal jugular vein stenosis outcomes.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Clinical Classification and Collateral Circulation in Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS) has recently aroused increasing interests, whereas, the factors affecting its clinical outcomes are not clear. This study aims to explore the probable factors affected clinical prognosis by evaluating the IJVS with different etiologies and strategies.
methodsPatients with IJVS confirmed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography (CE-MRV) were enrolled from October 2017 through October 2018. One-year clinical outcomes of the IJVS cases enrolled in this study were assessed by outpatient and telephone follow-up using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. According to the etiologies, patients were divided into thrombotic IJVS and non-thrombotic IJVS groups. And further, non-thrombotic IJVS group was divided into external compression and non-external compression subgroups. Outcomes of IJVS with different etiologies and strategies were compared and the probable prognostic factors were analyzed.
resultsA total of 118 eligible patients enrolled in this study, including 76 females and 42 males, mean aged 55.07±14.61 years. The average follow-up duration after discharge was 13.22±3.80 months. According to the PGIC scores, we categorized patients as good outcome and poor outcome groups. For thrombotic IJVS, patients underwent standard anticoagulant obtained remarkable PGIC improvement (100.0%
conclusionsIn this Chinese cohort, elderly degenerative bone compression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and previous HBV infection are the top-three probable etiologies of non-thrombotic IJVS and may involve poor outcome. Long-term head noises may predict IJVS and with poor outcome. Thrombosis-induced IJVS may get benefit from standard anticoagulation. Non-external compression IJVS can be corrected by stenting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.