Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31929980›Full record

Trial reportCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2019

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled

Fernando Sierra-Arango, D M Castaño, Jennifer D Forero, Erika D Pérez-Riveros, Gerardo Ardila Duarte, Maria L Botero, Andres Cárdenas, Jose De la Hoz-Valle

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Sierra-ArangoGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6372-7862
D M CastañoGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jennifer D ForeroGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Erika D Pérez-RiverosFundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-2513
Gerardo Ardila DuarteFundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Maria L BoteroPathology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall de Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Andres CárdenasGI/Endoscopy Unit, Institut de Malalties Digestives Metaboliques, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose De la Hoz-ValleHead of Subdirección de Estudios Clínicos y Epidemiología Clínica (SECEC), Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-2544
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá · COUniversidad de Los Andes · COUniversitat de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent chronic gastrointestinal disorder. It is defined as a condition developed when the reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation). This requires adequate treatment since it can lead to long-term complications including esophagus adenocarcinoma. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are generally used to treat GERD due to their high-security profile and efficiency on most patients. However, recurrent reflux despite initial treatment is frequent. Methods: A single-patient trial, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, was carried out from September 25th, 2012, to April 26th, 2013. It included one outpatient at the gastroenterology service in a fourth-level hospital, diagnosed with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). Yet, his symptoms were heartburn and reflux, and his endoscopic results were normal esophageal mucosa, without hiatal hernia, though pathological pH values. A no-obese male without any tobacco or alcohol usage received esomeprazole 40 mg/day and 40 mg/bid for 24 weeks. A standardized gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) was used weekly to evaluate symptom frequency and severity. The consumption of 90% of the capsules was considered as an adequate treatment adherence. D'agostino-Pearson and Wilcoxon test were used to determine normal or nonnormal distribution and compare both treatments, respectively, both with a significant statistical difference of Results: The patient completed the study with 96% of adherence. The double dosage of esomeprazole did not improve the control of symptoms compared with the standard dosage. Mean symptomatic score was 9.5±0.5 and 10.2±0.6 for each treatment, respectively ( Conclusion: There was no significant improvement in the patient GERD symptoms increasing the dose of oral esomeprazole during the 6 months of study.

Indexed as

Double-Blind MethodEsomeprazoleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleMiddle AgedProton Pump InhibitorsResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeEsomeprazoleProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31929980
PMCPMC6935808
OpenAlexW2995305788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.