ArticleCureus2020
Diagnostically Challenging Case of Renal Artery Stenosis in a Pediatric Patient.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Hypertension in Children and Adolescents as Observed by German Pediatricians-A Case-Control Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Case report: Endovascular treatment of transplant renal artery stenosis in patient with normal color duplex ultrasound of the renal artery.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- 3D-Printed Cold Preservation Device in Renal Autotransplantation for the Treatment of a Patient With Renal Artery Stenosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study we report a diagnostically challenging case of bilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) in a nine-year-old boy presenting as uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). The objective of this clinical case report is to draw attention to the unlikely combination of a classical clinical presentation with several normal investigations. This is a nine-year-old boy, known to have uncontrolled HTN, later diagnosed as a case of bilateral RAS. This patient underwent several imaging studies including: renal Doppler ultrasonography (US), diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) scan, and mercaptuacetyltriglycine (MAG3) renal scintigraphy with captopril challenge, with the aim of determining the cause of his uncontrolled HTN. The previously mentioned imaging procedures were carried out at two different medical centers over an extended period of time; however, the images failed to show any anatomical abnormalities to explain his clinical presentation. Due to this unexpected result the primary team in charge of this case opted for a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, as a diagnostic and therapeutic approach, by which the final diagnosis of bilateral RAS was concluded. During follow-up the patient was asymptomatic in all outpatient clinic appointments. Even though several initial investigations failed to indicate RAS, clinicians may pursue further investigations in cases of classical clinical presentation of uncontrolled HTN in pediatric population so as to not miss any diagnostically challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.