ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2019
Association between
Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association BetweenFrontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A Gut Signature of Microbiome, Bile Acid, and Quorum-Sensing Profiles Is Associated withMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Relationship betweenWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Correlation and influencing factors analysis of colorectal polyps with Helicobacter pylori Infection and p-S6K1 expression.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with Colorectal Polyps in Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Association of Meat Subtypes With Colorectal Polyp Prevalence: Finding From the Lanxi Pre-colorectal Cancer Cohort in China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodA total of 166 (87 males and 79 females, aged 53.85 ± 9.18 years) patients who had colonoscopy examination and
resultsPatients with
conclusionsPatients with
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.